Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC vs Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa vs Spiru Haret University
Side-by-side comparison from 111 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Knowledgeable & supportive faculty
- +Comprehensive & challenging curriculum
- +Extensive resources & facilities
Nothing to show
- +Flexible distance learning and accessible study resources
- +Good teachers and interactive courses
- +Convenient location and modern facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -Disregard and lack of student value.
- -Limited extracurricular opportunities.
- -Corruption within the system.
Nothing to show
- -Ineffective communication and poor administrative support from the school.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources for learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum content.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Location stands out as the university's strongest asset, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with the lowest score. Other categories like professors and internationality also performed well. Student life and facilities received moderate ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement. The overall value is considered good.
Nothing to show
This institution receives a commendable average rating, with its **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.2. **Professors** also scored highly at 4.0. Conversely, **Internationality** presented the weakest area with a rating of 3.2. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accommodation fall within a similar mid-range, with Student Life also slightly lower.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of university student reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable faculty, comprehensive curriculum, and extensive resources. Approximately 25% of feedback is negative, citing poor student treatment and limited extracurricular opportunities.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight accessible distance learning and flexible scheduling. Some note decent academic quality and good teachers, though it's not considered the absolute best.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show