Ghent University vs KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs Kask & Conservatorium School of Arts Gent - KASK vs Vlerick Business School vs European Wine Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 117 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and approachable professors
- +Strong curriculum with theory and practical application
- +Research focus and access to expertise
- +Practical, real-world business and technology focus
- +Inspiring, industry-expert lecturers
- +Unique, international programs and connections
- +Supportive staff and practical assistance for students
- +Dedicated instructors offering extra help and resources
- +Opportunities for internships and organized excursions
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
Nothing to show
- +Practical field exposure & industry professionals as instructors
- +Supportive and caring professors offering personalized attention and feedback
- +Inclusive and welcoming atmosphere fostering personal growth and a sense of belonging
- +Accessible and diverse course offerings with flexibility for individual student timelines
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Communication with staff is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor communication regarding substitutes.
- -Unsupportive and unaccommodating staff, particularly in internship support.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and lack of objectivity in some classes.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Internationality (4.35) and Facilities (4.35) are particularly strong, closely followed by Professors (4.31) and Student Life (4.31). Accommodation also scores well (4.15), and Value (4.25) is rated positively. The lowest-rated aspect is Location, coming in at 3.67.
This university exhibits an impressive internationality score, standing out as its strongest area. Location and value are also highly regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest marks, suggesting these could be areas for improvement. Professors and student life are rated positively, contributing to a generally favorable overall assessment.
This university presents a uniform evaluation across all assessed aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. Every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit low, performance level across the board, indicating areas where significant improvements may be necessary in all surveyed domains.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
Nothing to show
The university scores highly in location, earning a notable 4.5. Accommodation also receives a positive rating of 4. Areas of solid performance include professors, student life, and internationality, all with scores of 3.5. The university's weakest area is facilities, rated at 3.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong student life, receiving a high rating of 4.67. Location is also a notable strength, scoring 4.4. Conversely, the facilities received the lowest score at 3.9. Other areas like professors, internationality, and value are rated positively in the low to mid 4s, with accommodation also performing well at 4.
With 53 positive reviews and zero negative, students praise the user-friendly platform, considerate and enthusiastic professors, and strong research focus. Pharmacy and Biochemistry programs are highlighted for practical experience and leading scientists.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~96%), with students praising the practical, job-focused curriculum and inspirational, industry-experienced lecturers. There are no reported negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4/5, the sole review for KASK highlights exceptional support and internship opportunities for international students. Although classes are primarily in Dutch, professors offer extra help to ensure understanding.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, reviews are split evenly. Positive feedback highlights engaging guest lectures and real-world practice, while negative comments cite issues with consistent teaching staff, biased instructors, and unsupportive administrative interactions.
With a 4.18/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive, inclusive atmosphere and accessible, caring professors. A small amount of feedback (~18%) noted issues with international office management.
Ghent University is an ideal location for students. It has excellent facilities and a picturesque campus, and it's set in a charming town. The faculty are dedicated to supporting students and making sure they understand the material. Overall, I couldn't be happier with my choice to study here. I feel lucky to be part of such a wonderful university.
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
KASK was my host university for my Erasmus studies. It was the first time my university sent someone for Erasmus and they helped with all posible, they provided me with a spot in the residence, and with an internship in one of the professor's architecture studio. Clases are mostly in dutch, so it's not the most suitable place for an Erasmus student, still the teacher always offered to stay after class to go throw the main points in order to make sure I would understand. They also organise trips for the students, they would even put me in contact with a local student in case I would have any doubts, so she would help me out. The building was absolutely beautiful and quite close to the center. Public transport is a close option, but the best to move around and go to the university is the bike. Will definitely go say hi next time I go back to Ghent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
We didn't have a biology teacher for a full year. 4 different substitute teachers that weren't informed well by HoGent. The arts class is very educational, but the teacher is not objectieve at all. Was talking to the internship supporter, she doesn't let jou talk. Can't get a word in between. Very annoying. I don't feel like she cared to listen. She doesn't give a fuck. It's not okey! Don't expect support. There are some really sweet teachers. But overall no great support or organization.
Nothing to show
