University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Romanian-American University vs University of Craiova vs Spiru Haret University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS

Side-by-side comparison from 93 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova - UMFCV (4.70)
University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB: wins 0/6 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Craiova: wins 0/6 categories
Spiru Haret University: wins 0/6 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA: wins 4/6 categories
University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova - UMFCV: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Maths
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Bucharest, Romania
4.00
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Best programme: General Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.34
3.98
3.14
3.75
Not rated
4.80
Win
3.67
Location
4.20
3.82
4.57
4.25
Not rated
4.83
Win
4.33
Professors
3.59
4.15
4.29
4.25
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.51
4.33
3.29
3.25
Not rated
3.83
4.33
Student life
3.94
3.97
4.00
3.25
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Value
3.72
3.98
3.71
4.00
Not rated
4.83
Win
4.67
Accommodation
3.15
3.82
3.57
3.75
Not rated
4.20
4.67
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
  • +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
  • +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
  • +Helpful and dedicated professors
  • +Valuable student opportunities and international programs
  • +Well-structured and understandable curriculum
  • +Accessible and flexible for working students
  • +Competent and available teachers
  • +Modern facilities and engaging courses

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and accessible professors
  • +Relevant and enriching programmes
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong academic foundation with practical application
  • +Well-equipped facilities for hands-on learning
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated and poorly maintained facilities
  • -lack of clarity in course structure and grading
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
  • -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its Location, receiving the highest rating. Professors also perform exceptionally well. Conversely, the Facilities received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement. Student Life and Accomodation also fall within a moderate range, while Internationality and Value present further opportunities for growth.

This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.

This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in Professors (5), Accomodation (4.67), and Value (4.67). Internationality and Location also score highly at 4.33. Student Life is well-regarded at 4. The primary area for improvement appears to be Facilities, which received the lowest rating at 3.67.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Positive feedback (~100%) highlights empathetic professors and detailed, flexible courses. Students also appreciate the opportunities offered, despite some facilities being older.

With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.

With 100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight great teachers, knowledgeable professors, and excellent academic foundations. Students appreciate strong theoretical and practical courses, well-equipped facilities, and modern resources for skill development.

Rating distribution
5★
24%
50%
29%
25%
0%
50%
67%
4★
40%
33%
43%
50%
0%
50%
33%
3★
30%
0%
29%
25%
0%
0%
0%
2★
6%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My professors

My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Affordable location

Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close