Université de Nantes vs Audencia Business School vs Ecole Centrale de Nantes vs Digital College vs CESI

Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ecole Centrale de Nantes (4.30)
Université de Nantes: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Ecole Centrale de Nantes: wins 6/7 categories
Digital College: wins 0/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EPSI l’école de l’ingénierie informatique: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Master in Management
Best programme: Engineering
Paris, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.67
3.98
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.58
4.06
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.75
4.13
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.54
4.39
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.15
3.99
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.54
4.13
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.46
3.58
3.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse course options and competent instructors
  • +Abundant extracurricular activities and social events
  • +Strong industry reputation and career opportunities
  • +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
  • +Great facilities and well-structured classes
  • +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
  • +Strong engineering curriculum and practical application focus.
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors.
  • +Excellent hands-on learning opportunities and advanced facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are sources of dissatisfaction.
  • -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
  • -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
  • -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university's student life stands out with the highest rating, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting potential areas for improvement in housing facilities. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a mid-range of positive assessments, painting a generally favorable picture with specific strengths and weaknesses.

This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.

This institution receives strong accolades for its Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life and Value are also highly rated at 4.33. The University's Location garners a solid 4. However, Accomodation stands out as the area with the lowest score, receiving a 3.67 rating.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most students are highly satisfied, praising diverse academic options, competent instructors, and active student organizations. Integrations and online platforms are effective. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight the rigorous engineering curriculum, hands-on learning, and knowledgeable, supportive professors. Limited accommodation is a minor drawback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
13%
30%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
77%
65%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close