Universidad Europea - UE vs NOVA Information Management School - NOVA IMS vs School of Communication and Media Studies - ESCS vs Nova School of Business and Economics vs Universidade Lusófona
Side-by-side comparison from 237 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Highly accomplished, supportive professors and engaging academic environment
- +Strong career focus with practical skills and real-world market connections
- +Welcoming campus life and networking opportunities
- +Practical, professional preparation and market recognition
- +Autonomy and specialization options
- +Welcoming environment and helpful staff
- +High-quality, caring professors and practical, rigorous academics
- +Strong international focus and global orientation
- +Modern campus infrastructure and engaging, hands-on learning
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Positive campus atmosphere and facilities
- +Inspiring and creative environment with supportive and industry-experienced faculty.
- +Practical, project-based learning with accessible resources and active student life.
- +Modern facilities and dynamic, international atmosphere fostering growth.
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and lack of student support.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum issues.
- -Administrative and management problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor internal organization and administrative issues.
- -Outdated or impractical course content and teaching methods.
- -Overcrowding and lack of study spaces on campus.
- -Administrative and communication issues
- -Poor teaching quality and grading
- -Outdated facilities
- -Apathy from professors and unclear curriculum.
- -Inadequate teaching and poor resource provision.
- -Rudeness and harsh grading for self-taught material.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
Across surveyed aspects, this university demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a top rating. Professors and internationality are also highly regarded. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the lowest-rated area, indicating room for improvement. Other categories, including facilities, student life, and value, fall within a solid, positive range.
This institution receives a particularly strong rating for its Value, with a score of 4.57. Other positive aspects include high marks for Location (4.29) and Professors (4.27). Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality are areas with lower scores, coming in at 3.65 and 3.39 respectively. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not top-tier, ratings.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, notably **Internationality** (4.58) and **Facilities** (4.51), indicating a well-resourced and globally connected environment. **Professors** (4.29) and **Value** (4.36) also score very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.60, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options.
Overall, the institution receives a mixed but generally positive rating. Location stands out as the strongest aspect, achieving a perfect score. Student life and facilities are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Internationality and value for money are areas where improvement could be beneficial, as they receive the same middling score.
Examining the provided ratings, this institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Location**, achieving the highest score. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating among the assessed categories. Other areas like Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential improvement alongside recognized positive attributes.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
Most reviews are positive (~92%), highlighting accomplished professors, a welcoming academic environment, and career-enhancing opportunities. A small percentage (~4%) of feedback mentioned issues with course planning and institutional support.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~86% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent practical learning, autonomy, and preparation for professional communication careers. A small portion (~14%) mentioned some redundant information.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting qualified professors, an international environment, and practical, rigorous programs. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor organization and too many students.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting a dynamic campus atmosphere, engaging classes, and helpful teachers. A small portion of negative feedback mentions issues with international student support and outdated facilities.
About 64% of reviews highlight an inspiring, creative environment with supportive faculty and practical learning. A small portion of feedback (around 9%) mentions apathy from some professors and issues with curriculum execution.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
It is a good university to combine two main areas, management and technology. It has international teachers and the conditions are being improved in last few years. The Campus is also very well located.
Nothing to show
Nova’s MSc in Finance is the best program in Portugal. The quality of the professors is notable, they are very approachable. Career opportunities are broad and limitless. The school’s campus is super modern, with many spots to study and to chill. It is located right next to the beach, which allows you to go for nice walks, surf sessions, and so on, to keep your work-life balance. Your peers will be highly motivated and highly skilled individuals, which creates the perfect environment for a great learning experience. Having that said, Nova is by far one of the best choices you can make.
We pay a lot and we don´t have the best conditions. We have good teachers but there are a lot of teachers that are not that good at teaching and don´t give the best grades. The computers are old and it´s difficult to work with them.
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
