EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs UPF Barcelona School of Management - BSM vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO
Side-by-side comparison from 598 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, experienced faculty and applied learning methods.
- +Diverse, international student body and engaging environment.
- +Well-organized, motivating programmes with real-world relevance.
- +Supportive and approachable staff and teachers
- +Interactive classes with practical applications
- +International and diverse student environment
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Strong faculty support and high-quality education
- +Excellent career opportunities and professional growth
- +Prestigious university reputation and valuable networking
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Lack of depth in course content for those with prior knowledge and sustainability focus not met.
- -Arbitrary grading and rigid academic structures like assigned seating.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -The quality of education is considered basic, with a lack of proper study facilities and accreditation concerns.
- -Extracurricular activities are not supported, and the university prioritizes attendance over educational quality.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -Students often express frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Inconsistent or uninspiring teaching quality is a recurring concern.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
Regarding university ratings, location and internationality stand out as the strongest areas, both scoring very highly. Student life and facilities also received excellent feedback. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still a positive score, is noticeably lower than other categories. The university also performs well in professors and value.
Excelling in several key areas, this university boasts impressive scores for **Location** and **Internationality**, both near perfect. **Student Life** also received a very positive assessment. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker point, receiving the lowest rating. The university also earned solid marks for **Facilities** and **Professors**, with **Value** falling in the mid-range.
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
With an impressive average score of 4.625, professors stand out as the university's strongest asset. Student life and internationality also received commendable ratings, reflecting a vibrant and globally engaged campus. Conversely, facilities, while decent, presented the lowest score, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Accommodations and location received solid mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive experience across these aspects.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (93%), praising excellent teaching, engaging courses, and an international atmosphere. A small percentage of feedback (2%) notes organizational issues and arbitrary grading.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong student-staff relationships and a welcoming atmosphere. However, about 7% of feedback notes disorganization, basic curriculum, and communication issues.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
With an average rating of 4.3/5 from 44 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent faculty, career growth opportunities, strong networking, and valuable knowledge acquisition. No negative reviews were recorded.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
BSM gives you the opportunity to acquire much knowledge that serves you both professionally and personally. In addition, it gives you the possibility of entering new jobs in higher positions or even changing work areas. For how it makes you grow, for what you learn and for the contacts you reach, I totally recommend it.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
