University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs University of Chemistry and Technology of Prague vs University College of Business in Prague vs TC Business School vs Anglo-American University - AAU
Side-by-side comparison from 141 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, industry-experienced professors and supportive mentors
- +Challenging curriculum fostering critical thinking and real-world skills
- +Diverse international environment and small class sizes
- +Supportive faculty and program flexibility
- +Practical, hands-on learning with excellent labs and equipment
- +Strong community and international student experience
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +International and vibrant student environment
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical learning and skill development
- +Transformative learning experiences and career purpose
- +Dedicated professors, critical thinking, and open dialogue
- +Vibrant student community and lifelong connections
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency from the institution are prevalent concerns.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also highly rated, both scoring above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.92, suggesting potential room for improvement in this aspect compared to other university offerings.
The university's location received the highest marks, with a score of 4.7, followed closely by facilities and accommodation, both at 4.27. Areas for improvement include internationality, which scored 3.82, making it the weakest surveyed category. Student life and value for money were rated at a solid 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Considerable strengths are evident in the university's location and student life, both receiving high marks. Internationality and professors also score very favorably. The facilities and value for money are well-regarded, demonstrating a generally positive student experience. Accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest, though still respectable, rating.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, earning a perfect score. Its **facilities**, **professors**, and **internationality** are also well-regarded, all receiving strong ratings. Conversely, areas such as **student life** and **accommodation** present opportunities for improvement, as indicated by their moderate scores. The overall **value** also lands in the middle tier, reflecting a mixed but generally positive assessment.
Nothing to show
All 55 reviews are positive, with students highlighting excellent teachers, challenging curricula, and a diverse international environment. An average rating of 4.71 reflects strong satisfaction.
Nine out of ten reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, skilled faculty, and practical, research-oriented programs. Some mention demanding courses and occasional English communication barriers from instructors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All 74 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students highlight the international environment and helpful professors as key strengths. There is no negative feedback.
This university receives a highly positive rating of 4/5 from its students. The single review highlights transformative academic experiences, supportive professors, and a vibrant student community with ample opportunities for involvement and connection.
Nothing to show
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
