Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 313 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.15
4.21
3.77
4.40
3.92
4.50
Win
Location
4.50
4.60
4.23
4.17
4.70
4.93
Win
4.60
Professors
4.59
4.06
4.39
3.94
4.60
4.64
4.83
Win
Internationality
4.22
4.60
4.40
3.90
4.60
4.93
Win
4.67
Student life
3.69
4.25
4.14
4.10
3.90
4.15
4.50
Win
Value
4.38
4.43
Win
4.07
3.74
3.90
4.29
4.17
Accommodation
3.06
3.94
Win
3.59
3.39
3.00
3.62
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality courses and inspiring professors
  • +Stimulating academic and multicultural environment
  • +Excellent location with cultural access
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers and staff.
  • +Valuable business knowledge and specialization opportunities.
  • +Enjoyable campus life and enriching activities.
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create uncertainty and dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
  • -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
  • -Inadequate professors and poor organization
  • -Expensive and irrelevant courses
  • -Unmotivated student body
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its academic offerings and international appeal, with professors earning a notable 4.59 and internationality rated at 4.22. Facilities also received a positive 4.0 rating. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which scored a 3.06, and student life at 3.69, indicating these aspects are less highly regarded compared to the university's other evaluated features.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive academic environment. The university excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.0. Professors also receive strong marks, reflecting a high quality of instruction. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities** and **Value** indicate moderate satisfaction, while **Internationality** scores well, suggesting a diverse community.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 32 positive reviews and 0 negative, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise high-quality courses and professors, a stimulating academic environment, and the university's prime Paris location. Some mention challenging scientific subjects.

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising teachers, learning, and campus life. A small portion of negative feedback (around 6.5%) mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
60%
50%
32%
60%
71%
50%
4★
45%
28%
42%
42%
40%
21%
50%
3★
13%
9%
7%
19%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
1%
3%
0%
7%
0%
1★
0%
2%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Best teachers, best facilities

This university is a flagship of French research. The best teachers teach the fruit of their research. It must also be said that everything is done so that the student can pass exams with quality libraries and optimal facilities. It's an honor to be a student!

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close