Université de Nantes vs SKEMA Business School vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs LISAA School of Design vs Leonard de Vinci Graduate School of Engineering - ESILV
Side-by-side comparison from 179 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse course options and competent instructors
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and social events
- +Strong industry reputation and career opportunities
- +Practical, skill-building programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
- +Rich extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Supportive environment & welcoming community
- +Prestigious European university for design
- +Focus on practical application over theory
Nothing to show
- +Modern facilities and accessibility
- +Strong student associations, especially technical ones
- +Well-regarded programmes
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sources of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Concerns about financial focus over student well-being and discrimination.
- -Unorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university's student life stands out with the highest rating, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting potential areas for improvement in housing facilities. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a mid-range of positive assessments, painting a generally favorable picture with specific strengths and weaknesses.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with **Professors** and **Internationality** standing out as exceptional strengths. Students also appreciate the **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**. The **Value** offering is also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.
Nothing to show
Academic strengths and facilities are notable highlights, with professors receiving a perfect score and facilities earning a strong 4 out of 5. Conversely, student life, location, and internationality received moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas where improvements could be considered. Overall, the institution offers good value and accommodation options.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most students are highly satisfied, praising diverse academic options, competent instructors, and active student organizations. Integrations and online platforms are effective. No negative feedback was recorded.
Around 97.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills, career development, and enriching international experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its modern and accessible environment, though some note challenges joining student associations. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
