Università di Palermo - Unipa vs Instituto Tecnológico de Durango - ITDURANGO vs University of Erfurt vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla
Side-by-side comparison from 172 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous academic programs fostering resilience and critical thinking
- +Vibrant, characterful campus atmosphere with diverse spaces
- +Excellent teaching and supportive scholarships for international students
Nothing to show
- +Small class sizes and direct professor interaction
- +Strong academic programs with practice-oriented and interdisciplinary focus
- +Charming and affordable city with a vibrant campus environment
- +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
- +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
- +Supportive environment and career prospects
- +Friendly and accessible professors
- +Good learning opportunities
- +Modern facilities and location
- +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
- +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
- +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
- +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
- -Poor teaching and lack of support from faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unresponsiveness.
- -Lack of relevant international or career-focused programs.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication from administration and faculty.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
- -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
This university demonstrates a strong performance in academic quality, with professors receiving the highest rating at 4.04. Student life and location also score well, reflecting a positive campus experience. However, facilities and accommodation present areas for improvement, indicated by ratings of 3.08 and 3.12 respectively. Internationality also sits around the average, suggesting potential for growth.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong commendations across multiple aspects. Its location stands out as the highest-rated category, followed closely by internationality and value. Student life and accommodation also score well. The weakest area is facilities, though professors still receive a solid rating. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with some notable strengths.
Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.
This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.
This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.
With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal growth, a vibrant campus, and academic development. Negative feedback, representing about 7.7%, points to issues with administrative support and limited international programs.
Nothing to show
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the academically strong programs and engaged professors. Some mention occasional organizational chaos and slow bureaucracy.
Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.
It ruined my life, thank goodness I'm motivated to graduate because otherwise I would have already run away. I study Medicine and Surgery and the internships are carried out badly, there is no desire to teach students but only to exercise an abuse of power against them.
Nothing to show
Our university offers only double degree bachelors. That is the most interesting and frustrating thing that could ever happen to you. On the one hand, you only get half knowledge of everything, our professors cant teach us deeply during one course and the two faculties make you change your mindset every class. But on the other hand, you can dive into topics deeply thanks to the open structure, I learned how to think interdisciplinary and I learned how to think critically even in the discipline I study. Erfurt is an amazing student city and even though the university itself can be very unorganized, everything works out somehow because we have a very helpful climate with each other. Studying at Erfurt was honestly one of my best decisions.
The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show