London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Essex vs Birkbeck University of London vs University of Cumbria vs Stanmore School Of Business - SSB

Side-by-side comparison from 431 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
University of Essex: wins 1/7 categories
Birkbeck University of London: wins 1/7 categories
University of Cumbria: wins 2/7 categories
Stanmore School Of Business - SSB: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Future London Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Colchester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
62 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
35 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Lancaster, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.32
4.18
2.75
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Location
4.78
Win
3.80
4.59
4.00
Not rated
4.75
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.14
4.50
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.63
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.32
4.44
3.75
Not rated
4.63
Not rated
Student life
3.63
4.08
Win
3.76
3.25
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
Value
4.04
4.16
4.09
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
Accommodation
3.78
3.86
4.19
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Helpful and approachable faculty
  • +Diverse and enriching programs
  • +Positive campus and community atmosphere
  • +Supportive and caring staff communication
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse and motivated student community
  • +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
  • +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
  • +Enjoyable study environment and facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Poor transport links and inconvenient location
  • -Unsupportive and unhelpful faculty
  • -Unfair and unclear assessment feedback
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
  • -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for students.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

With an impressive score of 4.32, facilities stand out as a key strength, closely matched by internationality at 4.32. Professors are also highly rated at 4.14, contributing to good value. Location and accommodation, while solid, received slightly lower scores, at 3.80 and 3.86 respectively, representing the areas with the most room for improvement within the university's overall positive standing.

Academic and faculty excellence stand out, with professors receiving a near-perfect score. Location also scores highly, reflecting a desirable setting. However, student life and value represent the areas with the most room for improvement. Facilities and internationality are rated favorably, contributing to a generally positive assessment.

With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.

Nothing to show

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

~98% of reviews are positive, praising academic excellence, helpful faculty, and an enriching environment. A single negative review cited poor transport and inconsistent teacher support.

With a 4.26/5 average rating from 35 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong communication, caring and approachable staff, and knowledgeable, engaging lecturers. Small class sizes foster personalized attention.

Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
37%
43%
75%
0%
63%
0%
4★
44%
53%
40%
0%
0%
38%
0%
3★
19%
8%
17%
25%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close