emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Sichuan University - SCU vs Istituto Marangoni vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 208 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Diverse global community and peer learning
- +High-quality education and expert faculty
- +Excellent infrastructure and resources
- +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
- +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and unhelpful management.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in Location with a perfect 5. Professors and Internationality also received exceptionally high marks. Students appear to appreciate the overall Student Life and Value, reflected in their 4.67 ratings. The university's Accommodations, while still strong, represent the lowest rated area, though still a solid 4.33. Facilities also scored well at 4.625.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
All 9 reviews are positive, reflecting a 100% positive sentiment with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, global connections, and excellent faculty.
With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I am an international student at Sichuan university. Studying overseas had a profound impact on me. My viewpoint was expanded and my education was enhanced by navigating a new culture, getting to know people from different backgrounds, and immersing myself in a new academic environment. I like the experience of trying different kinds of cuisines although it is a challenge to adjust to new foods.
I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
