Imperial College London vs King's College London vs University College London - UCL vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Queen Mary University of London - QMUL
Side-by-side comparison from 1,416 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academics and research, with supportive and professional professors
- +Strong focus on skills development and valuable career/networking opportunities
- +Vibrant campus life with diverse societies and central London location
- +Supportive professors and engaging, relevant courses
- +Diverse international community and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and central London location
- +Expert, supportive teaching staff
- +Vibrant, diverse student environment
- +Central London location
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Positive campus environment and community feel
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Administrative and management issues plague the student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a significant concern.
- -The high cost of tuition is not reflected in the quality of education or facilities.
- -Administrative errors and accessibility issues cause significant problems.
- -Over-enrolled programs limit access to modules and reduce professor availability.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated teaching methods are disappointing.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
This university receives its highest accolades for Internationality, scoring an impressive 4.70. Location is also a significant strength, with a rating of 4.64. Conversely, Student Life and Accomodation present areas for potential improvement, both scoring just under 4.0. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated solidly in the mid-4s.
This institution receives excellent marks for its **location**, scoring a notable 4.81. Internationality is also a strong suit, with a rating of 4.62. Conversely, **accommodation** is identified as the weakest area, receiving the lowest score at 3.54. Other categories, including facilities, professors, student life, and value, fall within a generally positive range, indicating a well-rounded, though not uniformly outstanding, university experience.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring notably high. The **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Facilities** also received positive marks. **Value** is rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing areas. The area receiving the lowest rating is **Accomodation**, indicating potential for improvement in this category.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
With an average rating of 4.32/5 from 244 reviews, ~99.6% of feedback is positive. Students praise top-tier research, excellent lecturers, and extensive resources. One review found the campus small.
With a 4.16/5 average rating, ~99.6% of 236 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, interesting courses, strong practical application, and vibrant student life. A single negative review mentioned campus locations and international student draw.
With a 4.27 average rating, ~99% of ~354 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive staff, strong courses, and central London locations. A small ~1% of feedback mentions administrative issues and accessibility concerns.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
The University included different subjects which suitable for different person. Professors are nice and professional. When You have any questions, they are always ready to help and discuss with you. You can enjoy the study environment, the facilities in campus is in very good condition.
A top-ranking university. Best faculty/ staff and professors. I have gained tremendous amount of knowledge and skills during my 1 year master's program. As a result, I have grown academically, professionally and personally.
I like our school very much, because the school provides many club activities, psychological counseling and career experience activities every week, as well as free paper tutorials and resume revision services, which have laid a good foundation for my future development outside the campus. However, due to the heavy pressure of school work, I have limited time to participate in these activities. Maybe the school can carry out some seminars or courses to help us better balance study and various activities. In general, I highly recommend our school, it is a good place to study.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
