Brand Academy – University of Applied Sciences vs Bucerius Law School vs Hamburg University of Applied Sciences vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Nordakademie Graduate School

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Brand Academy – University of Applied Sciences: wins 4/4 categories
Bucerius Law School: wins 0/4 categories
Hamburg University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/4 categories
Kühne Logistics University - KLU: wins 0/4 categories
Nordakademie Graduate School: wins 0/4 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 0/4 categories
NIT The Business School at the Hamburg University of Technology: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Design for TV and Film
Hamburg, Germany
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Engineering
Best programme: Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Best programme: MBA In Technology Management
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.60
4.00
3.67
4.80
Location
5.00
Not rated
3.50
4.89
5.00
5.00
4.60
Professors
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.65
5.00
4.00
5.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.80
2.00
3.67
4.40
Student life
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.60
4.00
3.33
4.80
Value
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.55
3.00
4.00
4.40
Accommodation
5.00
Not rated
2.50
3.25
4.00
3.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Quality teaching and environment
  • +Strong academic and career focus

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated professors and engaging sustainability focus
  • +Positive campus atmosphere and events
  • +Supportive faculty and student engagement
  • +Supportive people and approachable professors
  • +Practical, real-world learning experiences
  • +Strong networking and international community
  • +Friendly and welcoming student community
  • +Supportive and caring professors
  • +Excellent campus facilities and opportunities
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
  • +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
  • +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
Cons
  • -Disorganized administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of support and engaging teaching.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support services are common complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication breakdowns and poor responsiveness from staff create problems.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners a perfect score of 5 across all assessed categories. Its strengths are exceptionally broad, encompassing facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings. The university presents a uniformly excellent picture for prospective students.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, with professors and student life receiving particularly strong scores. Internationality and value also stand out as notable strengths. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. Facilities and location are rated moderately, falling between the strongest and weakest points.

Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors and location. Student life and facilities also receive strong commendations. However, its internationality score indicates a notable area for potential improvement, while the value proposition is rated moderately. Accommodation also scores well, contributing to a generally positive, albeit uneven, assessment.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback with a 5/5 average rating. The sole review highlights excellent teaching and a supportive environment, contributing to a ~100% positive sentiment.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students praise dedicated professors and impactful sustainability initiatives. Some suggest improvements to dining facilities and lecture duration.

With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the campus, friendly atmosphere, and dedicated professors, though some mention the expense.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
67%
80%
0%
33%
100%
4★
0%
0%
0%
16%
100%
67%
0%
3★
0%
0%
33%
4%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Second Chance

My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.

Nothing to show

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Best Varsity

This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close