University of Surrey vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Surrey Business School vs The University of Law Business School vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 272 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and helpful professors
- +Accessible course materials and online resources
- +Positive campus life and amenities
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Relevant, well-designed programmes with real-world application
- +Strong support from knowledgeable and approachable staff
- +Excellent career prospects and placement opportunities
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Practical, industry-focused education and connections
- +Diverse contemporary music programs and courses
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Policies seem to favor certain student groups.
- -Negative campus culture is a concern.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues frequently disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning opportunities.
- -Limited career support and industry connections fail to prepare graduates.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. Professors also receive high marks, indicating a strong academic environment. Student life, location, and internationality are all rated very favorably, suggesting a well-rounded and appealing university experience. Accommodation is the lowest-rated category but still scores very well. Overall, the university offers a strong value proposition across its various aspects.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This university garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring nearly a perfect 4.9. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also received outstanding ratings close to 4.9. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Value**, which, while still strong, is the lowest-rated category at 4.6. Overall, student life and professors' ratings are also highly favorable.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution shows a mixed performance according to recent ratings. Its strongest areas are **Student Life** (3.0), followed by **Internationality** (2.5). Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.0) and **Value** (2.25) represent the weakest aspects. Facilities, Professors, and Location all received a middling 2.75.
With an average rating of 4.79/5 from 218 reviews, 99.5% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable tutors, accessible online course content, and the campus environment. A single negative review cited concerns about management and policies.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With a 4.81 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of students reported positive experiences. Recurring themes include engaging modules, knowledgeable and supportive staff, and strong employability prospects.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
University student reviews are mixed, with an average rating of 3/5. While one review is positive, another 25% expressed negative sentiment.
I just saw this link on the Surrey alumnis page. I thought it was really cool to have the opportunity to share my experience. Congratulations Eduopinions for the work. I studied in Surrey a few years ago, I graduated in 2000 and I think the university has changed a lot since then. However, I can say that I loved studying in Surrey and that my daughter is now studying there too!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
