Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs ITMO University vs Northwestern State Medical University by I.I. Mechnikov
Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world experience
- +Supportive environment and positive social life
- +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
- +High academic quality & skilled faculty
- +Global outlook & diverse programs
- +Career opportunities & strong network
- +Advanced labs and modern equipment
- +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
- +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
- +Supportive community and project collaboration
- +Specialized learning pathways
- +Focus on practical skills
- +Clear career paths & job prospects
- +Supportive learning environment & engaging faculty
- +Relevant & practical curriculum
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
- -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance impacts student success and well-being.
- -Negative professor attitudes and academic corruption.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.
This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.
Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.
This institution shines in key areas, particularly its excellent facilities and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. Professors and location also garner strong positive feedback. However, areas for improvement include accommodation, which scored moderately, and internationality, also receiving a middling rating. Overall, the university offers good value.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Conversely, its professors and internationality were rated moderately well. The university's value for money emerged as its strongest attribute, achieving the highest score. Areas for potential improvement are identified in professor quality and the international student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.
~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university is highly praised (~100% positive feedback). Students highlight a strong community and project collaboration opportunities. Theory quality varies by specialization.
This university receives overwhelmingly negative feedback, with 100% of reviews rating it poorly. The single review highlights issues with awful professors and unbearable corruption.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show