Marche Polytechnic University - UNIVPM vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs Sigmund Freud University - SFU vs Humanitas University - HU

Side-by-side comparison from 157 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR (4.90)
Marche Polytechnic University - UNIVPM: wins 0/6 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/6 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/6 categories
Sigmund Freud University - SFU: wins 1/6 categories
Humanitas University - HU: wins 0/6 categories
The American University of Rome: wins 3/6 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
3.92
3.77
4.33
4.60
4.33
4.71
Win
Location
4.33
4.23
4.34
5.00
3.80
5.00
4.43
Professors
4.00
4.14
4.01
4.67
4.00
4.75
Win
4.71
Internationality
3.50
4.22
4.11
5.00
Win
4.60
4.50
4.43
Student life
3.33
4.06
3.87
3.67
4.20
5.00
Win
4.57
Value
4.00
4.14
4.12
4.00
4.20
4.75
4.86
Win
Accommodation
3.33
3.78
3.25
3.67
3.60
5.00
Win
4.20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable, friendly teachers and diverse, practical courses
  • +Modern, well-organized programs with real-world projects
  • +Great facilities, including labs and collaborative spaces
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +High quality professors and intellectually stimulating environment
  • +International focus and diverse opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and manageable workload
  • +Expert and passionate professors
  • +International study opportunities
  • +Well-located campuses and student life
  • +International focus and English-taught programs
  • +Excellent facilities and proximity to research hospital
  • +Strong career prospects and innovative programs
  • +Small class sizes and personalized attention
  • +Strong academic programs with hands-on experience
  • +Cultural immersion and vibrant community in Rome
  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a significant concern.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and organizational issues are a major complaint.
  • -Ineffective and disorganized course structure and content are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of responsiveness from professors and university staff is frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication from the institution is unclear and infrequent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for students are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
  • -Unresponsive or unsupportive staff further detract from the student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

With a solid overall score, the university excels in its **Location** (4.33) and **Facilities** (4.17), indicating superior amenities and a desirable setting. **Professors** (4) and **Value** (4) also received favorable marks. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** present areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3.33. **Internationality** sits moderately at 3.5.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

The university shows a strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.34. Other positive aspects include **Internationality** and **Value**, both exceeding 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.25. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received solid scores, indicating a generally well-rounded educational experience.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its prime **location** and robust **internationality**, both scoring a perfect 5. Excellent **professors** (4.7) and **facilities** (4.3) also contribute to a positive academic environment. Areas for development include **student life** and **accommodation**, both rated at 3.7. The **value** proposition is solid at 4.

This institution garners considerable praise for its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.6. Student life and overall value are also well-regarded, with scores of 4.2. Areas for potential improvement lie in **Accomodation** and **Location**, which received lower ratings of 3.6 and 3.8 respectively. Professors are rated favorably at 4.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, notably achieving perfect scores in Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Professors and Value also received exceptionally high marks. While Facilities are rated well, they represent the lowest score among the surveyed areas. Internationality also stands out as a strong point, though slightly below the top-tier ratings.

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Highly positive student feedback (~83%) praises knowledgeable teachers and ample career preparation courses. Students also appreciate new facilities and opportunities for practical projects and collaborative work. No negative reviews were recorded.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting stimulating international environments, qualified faculty, and useful courses. A small percentage (~7%) mention issues with university organization, professor responsiveness, and course structure.

With a 4/5 average rating, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight passionate professors and the university's international opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting innovative programs and good facilities. Some mention an intense workload and occasional disorganization.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise the intimate learning environment, personalized attention, and opportunities for personal and academic growth within Rome's vibrant culture.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
36%
45%
33%
40%
75%
86%
4★
33%
41%
32%
33%
40%
25%
14%
3★
17%
23%
16%
33%
20%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Study spaces and location

What i preferred from my university (campus of medicine) was the proximity of the university to the main hospital where we could end up doing our internship. What I disliked a bit about my university campus was that there were a few spaces where the students could study around the university area, but since the students were a lot, I would like to improve that, so that if anyone has any problem at home or prefers to study at university, it would be a valid possibility. But I think there is always time for improving and overall I really enjoyed my university, the teachers are prepared and available for talking after the lessons and the classes are very interesting. What I also didn't like much was the campus life because since the medicine campus is far away from the other UNIVPM campuses, there wasn't much to do after classes. I also have to say though that is not hard to reach the university, so if someone doesn't have a car, you could always take the bus that stops in front of the university and go to Ancona downtown or to the very close beach.

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

A Mixed Bag of Good and Bad

I attended Sigmund Freud University during the academic years 2022-2023, and overall, my experience with the faculty was a mix of highs and lows. One thing that stood out positively was the incredible support and dedication shown by the faculty members. The professors at SFU were genuinely invested in their students' success and were always willing to help whenever students sought their guidance. They were approachable, knowledgeable, and went above and beyond to assist students in understanding the course material and academic concepts. However, despite the impressive support from the faculty, I must highlight that the organization at SFU could be improved. The overall system seemed to lack coordination, leading to certain aspects of academic life feeling unorganized. For instance, course schedules and syllabi were sometimes updated at the last minute, causing confusion among students. Additionally, administrative processes, such as course registration and academic advising, could have been smoother and better streamlined. Moreover, some professors struggled with managing their workload and appeared stressed at times, which impacted their ability to provide a consistent and structured learning environment. This lack of organization affected the overall learning experience and hindered students' ability to fully engage with the material. In conclusion, SFU is a place where students can expect a lot of support from faculty members who are passionate about teaching and willing to help. The dedication of the professors is commendable and greatly contributes to the positive learning environment. However, the university could benefit from implementing better organizational strategies to ensure a smoother academic experience for its students. Despite the areas that need improvement, the support and guidance received from the faculty make SFU a worthwhile institution for those seeking a strong support system throughout their academic journey.

Would undoubtedly choose it again if I had to

Personally, I am quite happy with my choice to come to study at Humanitas University and would do so again if I had to. It is by no means a perfect university, it is currently going through some 'growing pains' that result in disorganization, some professors are better than others, etc. However, it's a new university that is growing, the hospital is right next to it, the facilities are new and excellent, there is a lot of support for international students, etc. In my opinion, the pros heavily outweigh the cons.

A home far away from home

The American University of Rome is a home away from home where one finds their true selves with little to no effort. The small community has so much more to offer beyond the roman neighborhoods, the live full and generous community. You have numerous opportunities such as internships and workshops to deepen the knowledge and interest in your course. All this in the beautiful Rome!

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close