Central European University - CEU vs University of Vienna - UNIVIE vs Mining University of Leoben - MU vs University of Applied Science Wiener Neustadt - FHWN vs Graz University of Technology - TU Graz

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mining University of Leoben - MU (5.00)
Central European University - CEU: wins 0/5 categories
University of Vienna - UNIVIE: wins 0/5 categories
Mining University of Leoben - MU: wins 0/5 categories
University of Applied Science Wiener Neustadt - FHWN: wins 0/5 categories
Graz University of Technology - TU Graz: wins 2/5 categories
MCI The Entrepreneurial University: wins 2/5 categories
MODUL University Vienna: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Philosophy
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Bachelor in International Business
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Best programme: Business
Best programme: Bachelor in International Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
4.42
Not rated
4.00
4.60
4.63
Win
4.00
Location
3.44
4.61
Not rated
3.50
4.75
Win
4.67
4.00
Professors
4.22
4.26
Not rated
4.25
3.60
4.30
4.67
Win
Internationality
4.78
4.47
Not rated
4.50
5.00
4.67
5.00
Student life
4.00
4.11
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.33
4.33
Value
3.78
4.32
Not rated
4.25
4.80
Win
4.67
4.00
Accommodation
3.75
4.26
Not rated
3.33
4.40
4.60
Win
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse student body and international perspective
  • +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
  • +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
  • +Low tuition fees & high value
  • +International environment & diverse perspectives
  • +City's culture & urban campus experience
  • +Dedicated staff and professors who actively support student learning.
  • +Welcoming and helpful community among students and staff.
  • +Impressive, modern university facilities and a professional working environment.
  • +Flexible and practical part-time programs
  • +Experienced and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Small, organized structure for easy communication
  • +High-quality technical education and competent, approachable professors.
  • +Modern facilities and strong industry connections for practical learning and career prospects.
  • +Student-friendly city with a welcoming and supportive international community.
  • +Interactive teaching and modern technology
  • +Practical business and management programs
  • +International atmosphere and global connections
  • +Practical, globally focused business education
  • +Small class sizes and personalized learning
  • +Strong professor mentorship and supportive international atmosphere
Cons
  • -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
  • -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
  • -Lack of community and social engagement
  • -Poor campus connectivity and accessibility
  • -Unapproachable faculty
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources create significant obstacles.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a lack of support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Slow and poor communication from staff is a problem.
  • -The academic system is overly complicated and inefficient.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
  • -A perceived lack of value for money is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a lack of responsiveness are deeply disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.

This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a high rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also stand out with favorable scores. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. The university received solid ratings for its Professors, Accomodation, and Value.

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a consistent performance across all surveyed areas. The university received a rating of 0 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses, as all aspects are rated identically.

With most aspects scoring a solid 4 or higher, this institution excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated at 4.33. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life** are also highly regarded, each receiving a score of 4. The **Accomodation** stands at a respectable 3.5, while **Facilities** represent the lowest-rated area at 3.67.

An analysis of university ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Internationality** (5.0) and **Location** (4.75), alongside excellent scores for **Facilities** (4.6) and **Accomodation** (4.4). Student life is rated positively at 4.0, and value is highly regarded at 4.8. The weakest area, comparatively, is **Professors**, which received a rating of 3.6.

This university garners exceptionally strong ratings in multiple key areas. Location, Internationality, and Value are standout categories, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Facilities and Accomodation also receive high marks at 4.63 and 4.6 respectively. Professors, while still good, represent the lowest-rated area at 4.3, with Student Life closely following at 4.33.

This institution receives top marks for its internationality, scoring a perfect 5. Student life is also a considerable strength, rated at 4.33. Areas like facilities and location are well-regarded with a 4-star rating. The university shows good value at 4 stars and solid professor quality at 4.67. Accommodations present the weakest area, rated at 3.67.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.

Most students (~90%) highly value the university, citing low tuition and an international, culturally rich environment. Rigorous academic programs requiring self-study are noted, with occasional concerns about class waiting lists and limited social interaction.

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes include dedicated staff and impressive facilities, with students highlighting helpful professors and a professional working environment.

All four reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the program structure, experienced professors, and practical, well-organized offerings. There is no negative feedback in this sample.

University feedback is largely positive (~83%), praising dynamic programs, international focus, and supportive faculty. Some negative feedback (~17%) mentions slow administrative interactions.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Recurring themes include positive learning experiences with interactive teaching, modern facilities, and competent professors, alongside a strong international atmosphere and practical preparation for life after graduation.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Recurring themes highlight engaging, practical learning with case studies and real-world projects, fostered by small class sizes and strong professor mentorship within an international and supportive environment.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
48%
100%
20%
67%
33%
33%
4★
40%
43%
0%
80%
17%
67%
67%
3★
10%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
10%
5%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Professors & Opportunities for Entrepreneurs

I'm currently in my fourth semester of the International Business Consultancy bachelor program, which is fully in English and has a highly international demographic. The week-to-week lectures are generally very theory-based but they do provide a solid foundation for business principles that are essential for creating value and ensuring the profitability of a business. What stands out about this program are the professors. A great deal of them are hired externally and have succesful careers in their respective area of business (marketing, finanace, or management.) This has been very valuable because it allows students to network with current business professionals. There are also many opportunites for students with an entrepreneurial spirit. The university is very supportive of students that want to start their own business or have creative business ideas (bonus points if it's a sustainable business idea). I truly believe that students "get back what they put in" when it comes to this program. Also, the university is only 30-minutes by train to Vienna!

Poor interaction and bad online portal

TU Graz has very modern facilities that offer many tech advancements and amenities, while being situated in the center of the beautiful city of Graz. That is where all the positives end. The university is perfect for someone who likes to do things in the most complicated way possible, while receiving nothing in exchange. The interaction between students and professors/assistants/workers in different departments is nonexistent, very slow and cumbersome. Simple questions are never answered directly, but rather in the way of transferring you between different people who “can” answer it, while in reality everybody can resolve it but nobody cares to do it. The teachers just come to give their lecture and then mysteriously disappear until the next lecture. This lack of communication is further enhanced by the fact that the online portal is ancient, unnecessary complicated and unintuitive to use. While there was an update of the site for the last semester, it still remains completely unusable. The students find new menus, options and hidden buttons every day and this causes a multitude of complications. Also, the lectures and the exercises have nothing in common. The lecture teaches about one thing, while the exercise about another. And they are not further enhancements of each other, just different chapters of the script for the year. For example in one of them, we are being taught the beginning of the script, while the other focuses on the middle part of it, which is ridiculous because most of the chapters in the scripts are connected to each other. On another note, the majority of the students are extremely narrow-minded and don’t even try to make any type of social interaction. Everybody lives, stays and studies in absolute loneliness, which benefits the utterly depressing atmosphere on campus. Lastly, but definitely not on the last place, the final exams are scheduled absurdly. Last semester I had 4 exams in a week and 2 of them were in the same day. And the next exam was in the middle of our break two weeks after the other exams. It is impossible to finish all the subjects for a semester in one semester because they always overlap, keeping in mind the extracurricular activities are mandatory and are never scheduled so that one can visit all of their classes. These and more personal reasons are why the beginning of next year I will no longer be studying there.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close