Bocconi University vs University of Verona vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs Rome Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 370 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR (4.90)
Bocconi University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Verona: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/7 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/7 categories
Rome Business School: wins 1/7 categories
MIB Trieste School of Management: wins 3/7 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Milano, Italy
4.20
Read more reviews
108 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc in International Economics and Management
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: International MBA
Best programme: MBA in International Business
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Category ratings
Facilities
4.26
4.17
3.92
3.76
4.23
4.64
4.71
Win
Location
4.30
4.33
4.23
4.34
4.60
4.74
Win
4.43
Professors
4.27
4.00
4.14
4.03
4.51
4.67
4.71
Win
Internationality
3.95
3.92
4.22
4.14
4.80
Win
4.60
4.43
Student life
4.18
4.25
4.06
3.88
4.25
4.71
Win
4.57
Value
4.33
4.33
4.14
4.12
4.44
4.70
4.86
Win
Accommodation
3.90
3.92
3.78
3.28
3.94
4.48
Win
4.20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, highly qualified instructors and updated courses
  • +Strong foundation in management and economics with real-world application
  • +Numerous professional and integration opportunities
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty
  • +Strong academic programs and community connections
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +Strong international environment and diverse student body
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum
  • +Practical focus with real-world application
  • +Practical, real-world application of theory
  • +High-quality faculty with professional experience
  • +Engaging and inspiring learning experiences
  • +Strong industry focus and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Excellent networking opportunities and career support.
  • +Supportive environment and enriching personal development.
  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated teaching methods emphasize memorization over practical application.
  • -Limited and unpleasant facilities hinder the student experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is a significant concern.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Poor organization and lack of responsiveness from staff and professors.
  • -Unstructured and repetitive course content leads to minimal learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unprofessionalism and corruption.
  • -Lack of promised resources and outdated/inadequate course content.
  • -Difficulty reaching staff and unresolved technical/system issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Value for money stands out as a particularly high-scoring category, closely followed by location and professors. Student life and facilities also perform well. The areas with the lowest ratings are accommodations and internationality, suggesting potential room for improvement in these specific aspects of the university experience.

This university achieves excellent scores, particularly in its **Location** and **Value**, both receiving 4.33 out of 5. **Facilities** also score highly at 4.17. Areas for improvement are **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which both stand at 3.92, representing the lowest scores in the assessment. **Student Life** is well-regarded at 4.25, with **Professors** earning a solid 4.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

This institution excels in **Location**, earning its highest rating. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also received strong scores, indicating a positive overall experience. The university's **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect of student living.

A generally positive university review highlights exceptional strength in **Internationality**, scoring a near-perfect 4.8. **Location** also stands out with a high rating of 4.6. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score, at 3.94, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value also garnered strong marks above 4.

This institution garners impressive feedback, with its **location** standing out as the strongest area at 4.74. **Student life** and **value** also received very high marks, close behind at 4.71 and 4.70 respectively. **Facilities**, **professors**, and **internationality** are all rated well, around 4.6. The area with the lowest score, though still positive, is **accommodation** at 4.48.

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews are positive, praising rigorous, well-taught courses and professional integration opportunities. A small portion of feedback mentions administrative issues and outdated teaching methods valuing memorization.

Students highly praise the University of Verona, with 100% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include its safety, inspiring student body, and brilliant, accessible professors. The campus is also noted as beautiful and well-maintained.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, quality faculty, and stimulating environments. Negative feedback, from ~7% of reviews, mentions issues with university organization and administrative responsiveness.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94%), praising practical learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~6%) of feedback highlights issues with diploma delivery, administrative support, and perceived unprofessionalism.

With 43 reviews, ~100% are positive, averaging 4.81/5. Recurring themes include strong industry focus, practical application of knowledge, and excellent networking opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
50%
36%
46%
70%
81%
86%
4★
53%
50%
41%
31%
20%
19%
14%
3★
6%
0%
23%
16%
4%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
2%
6%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
An amazing experience!

I love the quality of education I received at Bocconi. Having previously studied Management back in Turkey, coming here to do my masters in Marketing Management allowed me to get much more specialisation regarding my field. I got to know more about the data side of marketing, which brought me a whole other perspective. The school itself has many opportunities to make your university life the best possible experience. I enjoyed the seminars held, the extracurricular activities carried out, the opportunities to join an association, and have also been staying in one of the residences of Bocconi, which has made my life so much easier. Overall, I can say that both in terms of the education I got and the campus life Bocconi provided me, I am very satisfied with everything.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

Great year

Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. ​Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.

Deep practical knowledge over superficial theory

The core strength of MIB Trieste lies in its sharp focus on practical application. Rather than providing superficial high-level overviews, the curriculum delivers real depth across every module, ensuring you walk away with usable, actionable knowledge rather than just academic theories. The program bridges high-level strategic concepts with real-world execution very effectively. ​If there is one area with room for improvement, it would be the career placement framework, which could be slightly more proactive in supporting candidates during their job search. That said, the academic rigor and practical readiness you gain more than compensate for it, making it a valuable experience overall. I highly recommend it to professionals looking for solid operational knowledge.

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close