ESCP Business School vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University
Side-by-side comparison from 272 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +European campuses and multicultural environment
- +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
- +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
- +Excellent faculty and professors
- +Recognized and high-quality programs
- +Engaging and practical learning experience
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +Practical, career-focused programmes with real-world skills
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers and staff
- +Flexible learning formats and opportunities for personal development
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Expert faculty and VIP guest speakers
- +Diverse international student community and cultural exchange
- +Engaging study programs with travel opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with updated knowledge and practical skills.
- +Experienced and dedicated faculty creating an engaging learning environment.
- +Focus on career development and job market readiness.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of transparency in the rating system and student support.
- -Program focus alienates certain student groups.
- -Administrative issues and unengaged professors.
- -Administrative and management issues, including registration errors and unexpected fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lack of engaging course content.
- -Insufficient student life facilities and inadequate communication.
Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.
With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
This university scores highly in several key areas, with location and internationality being particularly strong points. Student life and accommodation received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Facilities and value for money are also well-regarded, while professors are rated favorably as well.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
This institution garners consistently high marks, excelling particularly in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a perfect score. Its value proposition, while strong, is the sole area slightly below the peak, rated at 4.5. This suggests an overall excellent experience with a minor caveat regarding cost-effectiveness compared to other aspects.
Overall, the university receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.2. Professors and Facilities also perform well with identical scores of 4.125. The university's weakest point is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating. Student Life and Value are mid-range performers.
Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, student-friendly learning environments, approachable lecturers, and opportunities for personal development and internships. No negative feedback was reported.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
With an average rating of 4.4/5, nearly 80% of reviews highlight enriching academic and networking opportunities. Some feedback, representing about 20%, notes a lack of transparency in the rating system and administrative inflexibility.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs, engaging faculty, and career preparation. A small minority (~5%) mention administrative issues and a lack of student life facilities.
To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
No transparency in the rating system, almost a lottery No interest for students coming from the southern neighbourhood . Programme focused almost on eastern neignbours , Professors not always implicated with students (Master thesis supervision) A multicultural programme than can easly turn to a cultral chock An administration that doesn't interact with students, rigid and static with few exceptions However, the programme still really interesting, the campus is really nice and the residences are comfortable and well equiped, Professor & courses of high level
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
