University of Birmingham vs Aston University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Birmingham City University vs Ulster University

Side-by-side comparison from 492 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
University of Birmingham: wins 0/7 categories
Aston University: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 6/7 categories
Birmingham City University: wins 0/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 0/7 categories
Aston Business School: wins 0/7 categories
University College Birmingham - UCB: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
185 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
96 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
122 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
16 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.37
4.24
4.44
Win
4.41
4.07
4.14
4.44
Location
4.44
4.44
4.74
Win
4.27
4.14
4.64
4.50
Professors
4.15
4.28
4.75
Win
4.30
4.38
4.29
4.44
Internationality
4.30
4.32
4.60
4.26
4.09
4.07
4.63
Win
Student life
4.28
4.31
4.56
Win
4.19
3.94
4.38
3.81
Value
4.04
4.24
4.50
Win
4.13
4.28
4.21
4.25
Accommodation
3.95
3.55
4.32
Win
3.95
3.59
4.14
3.94
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Beautiful and engaging campus environment
  • +High-quality, expert teaching and well-structured courses
  • +Student support and post-graduation engagement
  • +Excellent teaching, helpful tutors, and comprehensive learning materials.
  • +Strong academic reputation and valued career services.
  • +Engaging courses with a good mix of theory and practical application.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-focused learning and career preparation
  • +Friendly, knowledgeable, and engaging staff
  • +Vibrant campus life and student involvement opportunities
  • +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
  • +Excellent location and facilities
  • +Practical, real-world curriculum
  • +Focus on personal and leadership development
  • +Supportive learning environment and resources
  • +Practical, industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Diverse and inclusive student community
Cons
  • -Inadequate support services and student representation.
  • -Poor course delivery and unprofessional teaching.
  • -Overcrowded learning environments.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of empathy and accessibility problems.
  • -Poor lecturer availability and coordination issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unsupportive mentors.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent concern.
  • -Limited resources and lack of essential amenities create difficulties.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates commendable performance across several key areas. Its location stands out as the strongest asset, followed closely by its facilities and student life, which also received high marks. Accommodations represent the weakest area of evaluation, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Internationality and professors' ratings fall within a solid mid-range, while value also presents a respectable, though not exceptional, score.

Across several key aspects, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas include Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Professors also received high marks. The weakest performing category is Accomodation, registering a notably lower score of 3.55. Overall, the university presents a well-regarded profile, with most areas exceeding a 4.2 rating.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution receives strong praise for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.41. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.30, with **Location** and **Internationality** closely following at 4.27. While **Student Life** and **Value** are solid, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a score of 3.95.

This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.

Examining the university's performance across several key metrics reveals a varied picture. The institution shines particularly brightly in **Location**, receiving the highest score. Conversely, **Internationality** garnered the lowest rating. Other areas such as Professors, Student Life, and Value also received strong scores, indicating a generally positive overall experience, though improvements in international student integration could be beneficial.

Considerable strengths are evident in the university's **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.625, closely followed by its **Location** at 4.5. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are also robust, both at 4.4375. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest score, registering at 3.8125, with **Accomodation** also receiving a comparatively lower rating of 3.9375. **Value** sits comfortably in the mid-range at 4.25.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 150 positive and 3 negative reviews, ~81% praise beautiful campuses and quality teaching. Few concerns, ~1.6%, mention issues with disability/mental health support and course organization.

With ~98% positive feedback, students praise strong teaching, well-organized programs, and helpful tutors. A small minority mention issues with staff empathy and lecture accessibility.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

With a 4.41/5 average rating from 124 reviews, ~99% are positive, praising practical learning and employability. One negative review cited poor teaching quality.

With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.

~100% of reviews are positive, praising the excellent curriculum, personal development opportunities, and supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nearly all (approx. 100%) reviews are highly positive, with students praising practical courses, supportive lecturers, and a diverse, inclusive environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
37%
38%
75%
52%
56%
29%
63%
4★
44%
53%
25%
40%
31%
57%
31%
3★
17%
7%
0%
8%
10%
14%
13%
2★
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
1%
3%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Employability

I have had a very positive experience in my first year at this university. I have found the staff very friendly, all content very engaging and felt I have been challenged throughout the year. One aspect that is particularly strong is the employability at Aston with all modules focusing on giving students hard skills to increase their employability. Only complaint would be some administrative problems such as delayed exam results and some issues with timetabling at the start of term.

New university

I am an international student who came from nepal to get education here. I have met new people and new friends. The teachers have been very helpful and are always teaching me new stuff. The university here i very nice and there is always new stuff to learn

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close