University of Birmingham vs Aston University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Birmingham City University vs Ulster University

Side-by-side comparison from 471 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Global Banking School (5.00)
University of Birmingham: wins 0/7 categories
Aston University: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 3/7 categories
Birmingham City University: wins 1/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 0/7 categories
Aston Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Global Banking School: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
181 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
96 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.70
Read more reviews
19 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
121 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Tourism Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.37
4.24
4.41
4.42
Win
4.07
4.14
4.00
Location
4.43
4.44
4.72
Win
4.26
4.14
4.64
4.00
Professors
4.17
4.28
4.74
4.30
4.38
4.29
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.29
4.32
4.58
4.26
4.09
4.07
5.00
Win
Student life
4.28
4.31
4.53
Win
4.20
3.94
4.38
4.00
Value
4.04
4.24
4.47
4.12
4.28
4.21
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.93
3.55
4.28
Win
3.96
3.59
4.14
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Beautiful campus and engaging, practical courses.
  • +Excellent, expert teaching and student support.
  • +Well-structured programmes with real-world application.
  • +Excellent teaching, helpful tutors, and comprehensive learning materials.
  • +Strong academic reputation and valued career services.
  • +Engaging courses with a good mix of theory and practical application.
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Academic and personal growth opportunities
  • +Diverse student community and good facilities
  • +Practical, engaging, and interactive learning experiences
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Strong career preparation and industry connections
  • +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
  • +Excellent location and facilities
  • +Practical, real-world curriculum
  • +Focus on personal and leadership development
  • +Supportive learning environment and resources
  • +Diverse teaching styles from various tutors
  • +Flexibility and adaptability fostered by module changes
Cons
  • -Poor disability and mental health support services.
  • -Inadequate course delivery, including overcrowded lectures and lack of seminars.
  • -Mismanagement of student organizations and unprofessional lecturer conduct.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of empathy and accessibility problems.
  • -Poor lecturer availability and coordination issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unsupportive dissertation mentors.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent concern.
  • -Limited resources and lack of essential amenities create difficulties.
  • -Inefficient administrative and communication processes.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong showing across most aspects, the university excels particularly in **Location**, earning the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also receive very favorable scores. The **Value** proposition is solid, and **Student Life** is well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the area with the most room for improvement, scoring the lowest among the surveyed metrics. **Professors** are rated positively, though slightly below some other categories.

Across several key aspects, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas include Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Professors also received high marks. The weakest performing category is Accomodation, registering a notably lower score of 3.55. Overall, the university presents a well-regarded profile, with most areas exceeding a 4.2 rating.

A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.

Facilities are a standout strength, earning a score of 4.42. The university also performs well in professor quality (4.30) and location (4.26). Areas for improvement include accommodation, with a rating of 3.96, and value for money, which scored 4.12. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid reputation across most aspects of student experience.

This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.

Examining the university's performance across several key metrics reveals a varied picture. The institution shines particularly brightly in **Location**, receiving the highest score. Conversely, **Internationality** garnered the lowest rating. Other areas such as Professors, Student Life, and Value also received strong scores, indicating a generally positive overall experience, though improvements in international student integration could be beneficial.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its teaching staff and international student experience, both receiving top marks. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are also highly regarded, all scoring a solid four out of five. While value for money is also rated at a perfect five, the professors and internationality stand out as the university's most impressive attributes.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~82% positive feedback and an average 4.17/5 rating, students praise beautiful campuses and quality teaching across diverse courses. A small ~1.7% of reviews cite concerns with specific departments or support services.

With ~98% positive feedback, students praise strong teaching, well-organized programs, and helpful tutors. A small minority mention issues with staff empathy and lecture accessibility.

With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

With an average rating of 4.41/5 from 123 reviews, ~91.9% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, engaging courses, supportive staff, and excellent campus facilities, preparing them for careers. A single negative review mentioned poor teaching quality and unsupportive mentors.

With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.

~100% of reviews are positive, praising the excellent curriculum, personal development opportunities, and supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 0% negative sentiment. The reviewer appreciated the flexibility offered by having different tutors per module.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
38%
74%
52%
56%
29%
100%
4★
43%
53%
26%
40%
31%
57%
0%
3★
18%
7%
0%
8%
10%
14%
0%
2★
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
1%
3%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Employability

I have had a very positive experience in my first year at this university. I have found the staff very friendly, all content very engaging and felt I have been challenged throughout the year. One aspect that is particularly strong is the employability at Aston with all modules focusing on giving students hard skills to increase their employability. Only complaint would be some administrative problems such as delayed exam results and some issues with timetabling at the start of term.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close