University of Liege vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs ICHEC Brussels Management School vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences vs Howest University of Applied Sciences - HOWEST
Side-by-side comparison from 181 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional academic and research opportunities
- +Strong student support and welcoming environment
- +Wide course selection and excellent facilities
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world experience
- +Supportive and accessible lecturers and small class sizes
- +Modern campus facilities and vibrant city location
- +Strong business and management foundation
- +Emphasis on real-world relevance and current company issues
- +Numerous international opportunities and study abroad experiences
- +Practical, real-world application of theory
- +Supportive, approachable lecturers and dynamic classes
- +Opportunities for international exposure and diverse collaboration
- +Practical, well-structured programs with real-world projects
- +Approachable faculty and strong student support systems
- +Welcoming community and diverse opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a perceived lack of support from faculty and staff are major concerns.
- -Unfair grading and unsupportive teaching staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -High costs and poor value for money are common complaints.
- -Disrespectful and unhelpful staff and teachers.
- -Poorly managed administrative processes.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas are Professors and Value, both receiving a high rating of 3.90. Student Life also scores well at 3.85. The weakest area identified is Location, with a rating of 3.41, though other categories like Facilities (3.65) remain respectable.
This institution garners strong ratings across most aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as its highest performing areas. **Facilities** also receive a commendable score. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the lowest-rated category, though it still achieves a respectable score above 4. Other evaluated areas, including Professors, Student Life, and Value, are all rated similarly, indicating a consistent level of satisfaction.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Professors and Value are also notable strengths. Conversely, the university's facilities and location received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student life, accommodation, and professors also contributed positively to the overall assessment.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also scored highly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weakest aspects, with notably lower scores. The **Value** received a solid, above-average rating, contributing to an overall positive university profile.
This university demonstrates particular strength in its **Internationality** and **Value**, both receiving top marks. **Location** also scores highly, suggesting a desirable setting. Conversely, the areas of **Accomodation** and **Student Life** show the lowest ratings, indicating room for improvement in these aspects. Facilities and Professors received solid, mid-range scores.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs and research opportunities. Students appreciate the faculty support, diverse course selections, and adequate facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.28 average rating, ~98% of 46 reviews are positive. Students praise the practical, project-based learning, accessible lecturers, and new campus facilities. One negative review cited unfair scoring.
With an average rating of 4.05/5 from 41 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise the demanding yet foundational business programs and opportunities for international experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
With 49 positive reviews out of 55, ~89% of students highlight practical learning, valuable skills, and approachable lecturers. Communication challenges with local language immersion and event organization were minor concerns for some.
With a 4.36/5 average rating from 11 reviews, ~91% are positive, highlighting a challenging yet rewarding curriculum, supportive people, and practical, career-focused education. A small ~9% of feedback mentioned issues with staff attitude and respect.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Nothing to show
I’ve just finished my degree in International Tourism & Leisure at Thomas More, and honestly, it’s been an amazing experience. The program gave me a solid understanding of the tourism and hospitality industry and helped me develop both practical and theoretical skills. What I loved most was the international approach and the hands-on projects with real companies, which really prepared me for the professional world. The professors were always supportive and passionate about what they teach, which made a huge difference. On top of that, I met incredible people from all over the world and made friends for life, which made the experience even more special. Thanks to this degree, I’ve gained not only knowledge but also great opportunities to grow and start my career in tourism. Definitely recommend it to anyone interested in this field!
Nothing to show
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Following the Advanced bachelor of bioinformatics in Howest Hogeschool, I have to say that is a really well structured program that targets to bridge the gap between theory and working environment and give you the necessary supplies to build up your future ! Professors are are really approachable and willing to help you.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
