Centro Federal de Educacao Tecnológica de Minas Gerais - CEFET-MG vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte - UniBH
Side-by-side comparison from 153 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong technical and engineering programs
- +Knowledgeable and approachable professors
- +Access to labs and hands-on learning resources
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
- +Good infrastructure and organized institution
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Strong preparation for the job market and career readiness
- +Excellent facilities and a welcoming academic environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Modern and broad campus infrastructure with labs
- +Convenient location
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
- -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks across multiple facets, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The location is also highly rated, though slightly below the exceptional standard set by other areas. Overall, the university demonstrates remarkable strength in almost every aspect.
This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
This institution receives its highest marks for Value, with an impressive score. Location also stands out as a significant strength. Areas requiring the most improvement are Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated similarly well, while Student Life falls in the middle range.
Outstanding marks in location, internationality, and value highlight the university's appeal. Facilities, while solid, represent its lowest-scoring area. Professors, student life, and accommodation all received commendable ratings, indicating a well-rounded experience. Overall, this institution offers significant strengths, particularly for those prioritizing location and affordability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. It highlights strong academics, particularly in technical fields, knowledgeable professors, and excellent laboratory access for hands-on learning. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With an average rating of 4.56/5, nearly all (~100%) of the 9 reviews are positive, praising excellent teaching quality, dedicated professors, and strong preparation for the job market. A slight suggestion for more professional education was mentioned.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include modern infrastructure, convenient location, and well-trained, supportive professors. Some minor administrative slowness was noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
