EU Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs New European College
Side-by-side comparison from 389 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
- +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
- +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
- +High-quality academics and practical, project-based learning.
- +Excellent international environment and diverse specialization options.
- +Strong reputation, research opportunities, and no tuition fees for many programs.
- +Diverse and customizable specialization options
- +High academic standards and strong career prospects
- +Excellent support for international students
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
- +Supportive, family-like community and approachable, helpful lecturers
- +Personalized attention and mentorship throughout the academic journey
- +Beyond academics, including city orientation and flexible admissions
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
Nothing to show
- -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
- -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
- -Disorganized and unsupportive administrative and management processes are a constant source of frustration.
- -Inadequate resources, including outdated facilities and insufficient technology, hinder effective learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient individual attention leave students feeling overlooked and unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student progress and fair assessment.
- -Outdated facilities and inefficient systems create frustrating learning environments.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
- -Unresponsive or ineffective administrative and management support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication regarding academic and administrative matters.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.
Across a range of key metrics, the university demonstrates generally strong performance. Its **Facilities** and **Value** received particularly high marks, indicating satisfaction in these areas. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored well. While still rated positively, **Accomodation** appears to be the comparatively weakest area, alongside **Professors** and **Location**, which received slightly lower, though still favorable, scores.
A notable range of scores characterizes this university's performance. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, reflecting a high degree of global engagement. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating, suggesting this may be an area for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, and Value also scored very well, indicating a generally positive university experience. Student Life and Professors also maintained respectable scores.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Overall, this university receives very positive ratings from students. The strongest areas of performance are Internationality, with a near-perfect score, closely followed by Professors and Location. Accomodation and Facilities represent the weakest, though still generally favorable, aspects of the student experience. The university also scores well in Student Life and Value.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.06/5. Students praise high-quality teaching, research focus, and valuable practical experience. International exposure and program flexibility are also highlighted.
With an average rating of 4.07/5 from 100 reviews, ~95% of students are positive. They highlight diverse specializations, high academic standards leading to good job prospects, and excellent professor support. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned overlapping course schedules.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
Students praise NEC for its personal attention from approachable lecturers and a supportive, family-like community. The college exceeded expectations, offering a valuable experience beyond academics.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Nothing to show
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Initially, NEC was not my first choice of university, but one of the top three when choosing a master programme. This was due to a specific programme I was searching for not being offered. As my enquiry progressed, this university quickly became my first choice. The staff was very responsive and fast, made up of some of the kindest people I have met. They were able to guide me through the process and answer all the questions I had. Further, the chancellor has been very hands on from the beginning of the journey, with an open inbox and an open door. He is able to help his students not only in relation to the university but any guidance which is needed for students in a new city or country. The professors chosen have been a part of NEC for many years and bring a wide variety of industry knowledge. Their unique master programme has been exciting, interesting and relevant to the current day scenarios. It has been the right amount of challenging but all worth it. The environment is one of the most welcoming and supportive that I have ever experienced, and I would recommend New European College to anyone who is passionate about their future and education.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
