Vilnius University vs Kaunas University of Technology - KTU vs Lithuanian University of Health Science - LSMU vs University of Tartu - UT vs Kaunas University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 422 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Practical learning and international opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and welcoming community
- +Development of academic and personal skills
- +High-quality education with experienced professors
- +Modern facilities and practical learning opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and extracurricular activities
- +World-class education and research focus
- +Approachable and expert professors
- +Strong community and student life
- +Knowledgeable, approachable, and helpful lecturers
- +Relevant course content for practical skills
- +Positive campus environment and student activities
- +Supportive lecturers and organized study process
- +Abundant extracurricular events and opportunities
- +Modernizing facilities and convenient location
- +Engaging, practical learning with real-world application
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum and positive environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative insensitivity and focus on fees over student well-being.
- -Rude and unhelpful staff, with an over-enrollment strategy.
- -Inconsistent course delivery and language barriers.
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods
- -Lack of practical skill development and outdated lab facilities
- -Poor communication and lack of engagement with new approaches
- -Lack of engaging and relevant course content.
- -Poor communication and feedback from instructors.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Some professors are perceived as unhelpful or lacking engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff is a common complaint.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong performance in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience, though it still garners a respectable score. Other key areas like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a close, positive range, indicating a generally well-rounded university.
This institution shines brightest in **Value**, boasting a rating of 4.275, closely followed by **Location** (4.192) and **Professors** (4.175). Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score at 3.617, with **Accomodation** and **Student Life** also ranking lower compared to other aspects. Facilities are rated a solid 4.008.
Academic excellence and global engagement are key strengths, with Professors, Location, and Internationality all scoring highly. Value for money also stands out as a significant positive. The university's weakest area is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating, though Facilities and Student Life are still rated positively.
With impressive scores in key areas, this university excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both rated at 4.67. **Student Life** also garners a strong 4.33. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest rating at 2.67, and **Facilities**, at 3.67. **Internationality** scores 3.67, while **Value** is rated a solid 4.
This university receives commendations in several key areas, with an outstanding 4.5 for Location. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.38. Facilities and Student Life are well-regarded with a 4.25 rating. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality represent the weaker aspects, with scores of 3.91 and 3.85 respectively.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **student life**, both receiving very high marks. **Facilities** and **value** also score exceptionally well. Conversely, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are areas that received comparatively lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these specific aspects.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With 193 positive reviews and 0 negative reviews, feedback overwhelmingly highlights quality education, supportive faculty, and international opportunities. Students appreciate practical learning and personal skill development, contributing to an average rating of 4.51/5.
~71% of reviews are positive, highlighting good study quality, experienced professors, and smooth communication. ~14% of feedback is negative, citing poor student treatment and administrative issues. The average rating is 3.93/5.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (96.7%) praises the university's high academic quality, strong research focus, and approachable professors. A small percentage of negative reviews (3.3%) cite low educational levels and outdated teaching methods.
The four reviews are all positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highly recommend the university, praising knowledgeable lecturers, relevant course content, and a positive campus environment. Some mention administrative support could be quicker.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, an organized academic environment, and convenient location. A single negative review found standards low compared to others.
With a 4.8/5 average rating, reviews are ~100% positive. Students praise the mind-blowing environment, friendly professors, and practical curriculum. Some noted occasional teaching weaknesses in English for international students.
This is one of the best universities in Lithuania right now. After taking admission here, I joined the classes and the learning system impressed me greatly. We have online learning moodle , where we can find everything that is taught in the class also we get all updates and study materials here. We can submit our lab works and assignments here that can helps us to track all the things. Apart from this, we have got humble teachers who are very cooperative and helpful to us. As a non EU student, I feel these things are adorable to me.
Studying at Kaunas University of Technology has been a really good experience for me so far. I am studying Industrial Engineering Management, and I like how the program combines engineering knowledge with management and business skills. The subjects are practical and useful, especially for understanding how industries and companies work in real life. The teachers are friendly and supportive, and most of them are always ready to help students when needed. I also enjoy the international environment at KTU because I get to meet people from different countries and learn about different cultures. It makes university life more interesting and enjoyable. Another thing I appreciate is that the university focuses not only on theory but also on practical learning, teamwork, and projects. This helps students prepare for future jobs and gain confidence in their skills. Overall, I feel happy to study at Kaunas University of Technology. It is a good university for students who want quality education, personal growth, and better career opportunities in the future.
Overall food science is an emerging field. University studies integrated with both practical approach for students learning and development. Moreover, corporation eith Erasmus programme and traineeship enchanced the learning thtough EU communiyy and International market.
The general quality of the university is very solid, one of the best in the Baltics. The geology majors in both Bachelor's and Master's give an comprehensive overview of the major as well as real opportunities to work in the field either in the form if pracis or internships in major Estonian geology institute's. The equipment is up to par with other big European universities and si is the quality if the education. There's also a strong sense of community which makes stuides and work more fluid.
Nothing to show
I'm just started studying Mathematics. The matherial, which lectors are giving to us, and the way of the studying is simple. Also there is options to study by ourselves in rooms with noise isolation. And also I can see, that the university collect a advises from students to develop.
My experience at the university has been generally positive, especially because of its practical approach to learning. The classes are more focused on real-world application rather than only theory, which helps me understand how things work in actual job situations. Some professors are very supportive and explain topics clearly, always willing to help when students have questions. However, there are also a few classes where the teaching could be more engaging and better organized. What stood out to me the most is the multicultural environment and the opportunity to meet students from different countries. This really helped me grow personally and improve my communication skills. Campus life is decent, but I think more student activities and events could make it even better and more enjoyable. Overall, I would recommend this university to future students who prefer practical learning and an international environment, but I also believe there is still room for improvement in teaching consistency and student engagement.
