Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Universidad de La Laguna vs C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S
Side-by-side comparison from 178 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Strong practical focus with real-world brand experience
- +Supportive teachers and excellent campus facilities/resources
- +Diverse, multicultural student body and environment
- +Passionate and impactful instructors
- +Favorable learning experiences and positive personal growth
- +High-quality facilities and resources, including a great library
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- +Practical, real-world projects with leading companies
- +Supportive professors and personalized feedback
- +International and collaborative community environment
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for many students.
- -Poor organization and outdated facilities.
- -Substandard teaching staff and curriculum.
- -Inefficient and uninspiring learning experiences.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in internationality, boasting a rating of 4.65. Facilities also received strong acclaim at 4.56, closely followed by professors at 4.53 and value at 4.48. The student experience is well-regarded, with a 4.35 rating for student life. Location and accommodation represent the areas with the lowest scores, both falling in the upper 3-point range.
Reviewing the university's performance across various aspects, student life and value emerge as the strongest areas, both scoring 3.7. Location and professors also received favorable marks at 3.45 and 3.4 respectively. On the other hand, facilities present the weakest area with a rating of 2.9625, followed closely by accommodation at 3.0625. Internationality and accommodation fall in the mid-range, indicating moderate satisfaction in these categories.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings in multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded with a score of 4.86, closely followed by location (4.77) and student life (4.76). Facilities and value also receive high marks. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 4.29, though it still indicates a generally positive student experience.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
With ~94% positive sentiment, reviews highlight enriching theoretical and practical skills, multicultural environments, and helpful teachers. Some noted the campus is a bit far from the city. No negative feedback was reported.
Around 30% of reviews highlight qualified staff, good learning experiences, and job prospects. However, some mention poor facilities, disorganization, and outdated programs, with negative feedback from approximately 19% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
With 23 positive reviews and zero negative, feedback highlights a highly satisfactory experience. Students praise the program's practical approach, real-world projects with leading companies, and supportive, family-like community. Personalized feedback and a strong network are recurring themes.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
My experience studying at the University of La Laguna (Tenerife-Canary Islands, Spain) was very positive. I started studying a Diploma in Advanced Studies (Pre-Doctorate) in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, after my foreign Degree in Food Engineering was considered comparable in Spain to a Bachelor's Degree in Food Science and Technology (ULL). This area of knowledge has allowed me to gain work experience, worldwide. I am currently in Canada, where this academic degree was also recognized as equivalent to a Bachelor in Science (Food) by the Province of Alberta (IQAS).
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
