EAE Business School vs EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 633 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Expert tutors and practical, applicable knowledge
- +Comprehensive curriculum and flexible learning options
- +Diverse international community and enriching global perspectives
- +Strong academic programs with real-world application and expert faculty
- +Engaging learning environment with practical case studies and soft-skills development
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
- +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
- +Strong community and international atmosphere
- +Collaborative environment and strong community
- +Practical learning with experienced faculty
- +Career development support and international opportunities
- +Excellent organization and clear, accessible courses.
- +Supportive staff and personalized academic attention.
- +Modern facilities and diverse international opportunities.
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -The quality of education is criticized for being superficial and not job-preparatory.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Program content and delivery do not consistently meet expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
- -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
- -The curriculum lacks focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Facilities and IT infrastructure appear outdated and insufficient.
- -Poor leadership and unprofessional management are prevalent.
- -Ineffective teaching quality due to unqualified instructors is a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Location**, achieving a score of 3.82. Conversely, its weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.07. Other aspects like Professor quality, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally consistent but not outstanding profile across the board.
This institution achieves strong scores across multiple metrics, with an exceptional rating for Location (4.93). Student Life and Internationality also stand out with ratings above 4.5. Among the surveyed areas, Accomodation received the lowest score at 4.17, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a high rating. Internationality and Value are also positive aspects. Conversely, Accomodation appears to be an area for potential improvement, indicated by the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Facilities and Location also received mid-range ratings.
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects. Accommodations stand out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities and Professors are also rated highly at 4.14. Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received a solid score of 4. This indicates a well-rounded institution with particular strengths in student living arrangements and academic personnel.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Approximately 65% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable skills, multicultural environments, and expert tutors. A smaller portion, around 13%, expresses concerns regarding class depth and administrative responsiveness.
~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting a multicultural environment, strong academic content, and valuable personal/professional development. A few reviews note issues with administrative flexibility and program delivery.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.
Approximately 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong collaboration, practical learning, and career support. About 9% of reviews are negative, mentioning issues like finances and logistical challenges.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent academic environments, helpful staff, and good organization. One reviewer mentioned unprofessional director and unqualified staff.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
I am deeply disappointed with my experience at EAE Business School. I regret wasting both my time and money on this institution, and I feel compelled to share my experience to help others avoid making the same mistake. First and foremost, it is evident that students' concerns and issues are not a priority for EAE. The administration's lack of response and follow-up on critical matters is appalling. I have had to chase them multiple times for essential documents, and even then, they failed to deliver. For instance, I needed an academic confirmation for my visa renewal. Despite my persistent efforts and numerous emails, I have yet to receive this crucial document. Their standard response is a simple "okay," but no real action is taken, leaving students in limbo. Academically, the situation is equally disheartening. Although I was enrolled in an English-taught program, I can confidently say that at least 90% of the professors lacked proficiency in English. Their inability to communicate effectively and convey the course material was a significant barrier to learning. Moreover, it seemed that many of the instructors lacked the necessary knowledge and expertise in their respective fields. It appears that the hiring standards at EAE do not prioritize the academic qualifications or language skills of their faculty, which severely undermines the quality of education provided. The overall environment at EAE feels more like a daycare center than a reputable business school. The lack of professionalism, coupled with inadequate academic support, makes it clear that the institution does not take the education of its students seriously. The administration's disregard for students' needs and the subpar teaching quality make it impossible to recommend this school to anyone. In conclusion, attending EAE Business School has been a colossal waste of time and money. If you value your time, money, and education, I strongly advise you to look elsewhere. Do not make the mistake of enrolling in this institution.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
If you are looking for a law specialization master's degree (LLM) in the non so traditional areas of law, and you are seeking for an international fully enriching experience, ESADE is your best choice. ESADE started as a business school so the MBA and other business degrees are their core. Nonetheless, law education and in particular the specialisation master's (international business law and intellectual property and ICT law) are also on the top Europe's LLM of their fields. They combine an excellent program, with the best teachers available in Barcelona and with a more than enough amount of resources to study and help the student to get initiated in their career field. Also, this is the best international experience out there; personally, I got to share a classroom with other 25 students, where only 6 of them were Spanish, the other 19 including myself were a mixture of different nationalities, especially from Latin American countries.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
