School of Professional and Continuing Education - HKU Space vs The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology - HKUST vs City University of Hong Kong - CityU vs Hong Kong Metropolitan University - HKMU vs ESEUNE Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, experienced lecturers with industry networks
- +Valuable networking opportunities through facilitators and peers
- +Abundant free events and resources
- +Supportive professors and helpful administrators
- +Beautiful and modern campus environment
- +Ample career and extracurricular opportunities
- +Strong program depth and regional focus
- +Experienced and helpful faculty mentorship
- +Practical skills and real-world experience opportunities
- +Accessible and experienced lecturers with strong industry connections.
- +Affordable tuition and ample financial aid opportunities.
- +Positive and supportive campus atmosphere with flexible schedules.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Welcoming and multicultural campus environment
- +Conducive learning atmosphere
- +International student diversity
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support create a negative environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback is a consistent problem.
- -Outdated facilities and low university ranking are major drawbacks.
- -Poor English proficiency among some professors hinders learning.
- -Lack of campus atmosphere and strict policies are disliked.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Excessive fees and poor financial transparency.
- -Inadequate student support services and career guidance.
- -Disappointing facilities and outdated technology.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no areas of particular strength or weakness were identified in the assessment of its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent score suggests a uniform lack of positive attributes or a complete absence of data in each evaluated aspect.
This institution receives strong marks for its facilities and value, both rated at 4.17. Professors and internationality are also well-regarded with scores of 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include student life (3.5), with location and accommodation scoring a slightly higher 3.67. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets.
With outstanding marks in **Professors, Location, and Value (all 5/5)**, this institution excels in key areas. Student life and accommodation also receive very high scores (4.8/5). Facilities are rated well at 4/5, while Internationality stands out as the relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.2/5.
Overall, the university receives generally positive evaluations. It excels in its **Professors** and **Facilities**, both scoring well. The **Location** and **Value** are also considered strong points. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving the lowest rating, with **Internationality** and **Student Life** also performing moderately.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded, receiving solid ratings. The university excels particularly in its infrastructure, academic staff, geographical position, global outlook, and affordability, while student engagement and housing offerings are commendable.
The single review is positive (100%), with an average rating of 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights an experienced lecturer with practical knowledge and networking opportunities, as well as helpful volunteer facilitators.
With an average rating of 4/5, students praise the scenic campus, supportive professors, and available opportunities. Though a small percentage of feedback mentions challenging accents and harsh grading, the majority is positive.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the university's strong programs, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities like internships and exchange programs.
Nearly all reviews (~86%) are positive, praising approachable lecturers, affordable tuition, and a diverse student body. A small percentage (~14%) notes low English proficiency from some professors and limited campus facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university received one overwhelmingly positive review. The reviewer highlighted a friendly and clean campus, conducive to learning, and appreciated the multicultural atmosphere with a diverse student body. There were no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The lowest university rank in Hong Kong. Some professor English level is extremely low. You don’t feel like this is a university because they lack of campus facility with only two huge buildings for the students. Most of the student just come here to go to class and then usually directly go back home. The school is quite flexible because they don't take any attendance in my major. The only advantage for me is the university is in Hong Kong. That's it !
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show