Instituto Químico de Sarriá - IQS vs Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad de Guadalajara - UDG vs National Sun Yat-sen University - NSYSU vs TIAS School for Business and Society

Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: TIAS School for Business and Society (5.00)
Instituto Químico de Sarriá - IQS: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Guadalajara - UDG: wins 0/7 categories
National Sun Yat-sen University - NSYSU: wins 0/7 categories
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 5/7 categories
University of Greenwich - UoG: wins 0/7 categories
University of Georgia: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Digital Management
Best programme: Foreign Languages and Literature
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
64 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Athens, Georgia, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.32
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.25
4.44
Location
4.00
4.32
4.22
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.52
4.31
Professors
3.67
4.27
3.70
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.34
4.39
Internationality
4.00
4.14
3.70
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.56
3.83
Student life
4.33
4.36
3.80
Not rated
2.00
4.25
4.61
Win
Value
4.00
4.10
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.23
4.11
Accommodation
4.33
Win
3.88
3.13
Not rated
2.00
3.82
4.13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical work and supportive staff
  • +Rewarding connections and tranquil atmosphere
  • +Convenient location and nice facilities
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Excellent faculty and academic reputation
  • +Extensive facilities and campus resources
  • +Supportive and engaging student body
  • +Supportive environment for language and cultural immersion
  • +Accessible international programs taught in English
  • +Democratic atmosphere for cultural exploration
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Welcoming and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning and real-world exposure
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and friendly people
  • +Engaging courses and supportive professors
  • +Vibrant social life and diverse opportunities
Cons
  • -Unhelpful or inaccessible staff and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance of buildings.
  • -Limited career support and irrelevant course content.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Excessive administrative and bureaucratic hurdles create frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of student support and resources.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Poor organization and lecturer availability are significant problems.
  • -Disruptions from strikes negatively impacted the learning experience.
  • -The value for money is perceived as poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

An overall assessment reveals the university excels in its facilities, earning a high 4.5-star rating. Student life and accommodation also score well at 4.33. The weakest area, however, is the professors, with a rating of 3.67. Location, internationality, and value all received solid 4-star ratings, indicating a generally positive but not perfect student experience.

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

This university demonstrates a strong performance in its location and value, both receiving high ratings. Student life and internationality also score well, indicating a positive and diverse campus experience. Conversely, accommodation is identified as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Facilities and professors also fall in the mid-range.

Overall, this university received consistently low ratings across all surveyed aspects, with no areas standing out as particularly strong or weak. Scores of zero were recorded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This suggests significant room for improvement in every facet of the university experience.

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Internationality** and **Location** emerging as its strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.5. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are consistently strong, generally falling within the 4.2 to 4.3 range, indicating a well-rounded experience.

This university demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with student life emerging as its strongest area at 4.61. Facilities and professors also received high marks, reflecting well on the academic and physical environment. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.83. Accommodation and value are solid, though not as exceptional as the top-rated aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.33 average rating, reviews are largely positive, highlighting practical work, friendly staff, and good facilities. No negative feedback was reported.

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

The university receives a strong 4/5 average rating, with ~100% of feedback being positive. Recurring praise highlights excellent teachers and high academic relevance, though some students mention limited scheduling options and room for improvement in scientific research.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights a great environment for learning Chinese, including native speakers and cultural exploration. Programs taught in English are also a positive aspect for international students.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.42 average rating from 64 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive faculty, a vibrant community, and a beautiful campus. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.6%) noted organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.

With an average rating of 4.28, virtually all (100%) of the 18 reviews are positive. Students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong professors, diverse opportunities, and positive social and academic experiences.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
31%
0%
100%
56%
33%
4★
33%
42%
38%
100%
0%
31%
61%
3★
67%
8%
31%
0%
0%
11%
6%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close