Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Tecnológica de San Juan del Río - UTSJR vs De Montfort University - DMU vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 118 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +Close industry links and career readiness
- +Top-tier engineering and business programs
- +Strong academic reputation and classification
- +Engaging professors with subject passion and practical teaching
- +Strong academic quality and research opportunities
- +Supportive learning environment with industry connections and extracurriculars
- +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
- +Strong business programs and professional connections
- +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
- +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
- +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are major concerns.
- -Communication and course content are often seen as inadequate.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of progression to higher education.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful faculty, with vague or harsh feedback.
- -Technical issues with submitting work.
- -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
- -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
- -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
This institution presents a consistent, albeit minimal, performance across all surveyed categories. There are no standout strengths or weaknesses indicated by these ratings, as all aspects—facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value—are rated equally at zero. The data suggests a neutral, undeveloped profile in every area assessed.
With a generally positive evaluation, this university excels in its **Location** (4.35) and **Student Life** (4.33). **Facilities** also received a high score (4.32), closely followed by **Internationality** (4.30). While **Accomodation** (4.13) and **Value** (4.12) are still solid, **Professors** (4.07) represent the lowest-rated aspect among the surveyed categories.
The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review is positive. This feedback highlights the university's strong connection to the productive sector and its high-ranking engineering programs.
~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic quality, engaging professors, and great facilities. A small amount of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions challenges with accessibility and feedback quality for some courses.
University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Regrettably, I cannot offer a recommendation for Comic and Concept art due to the following reasons: Firstly, the accessibility of the teachers proved to be quite challenging as they were unresponsive to multiple email attempts throughout the entire year. Moreover, the feedback provided was often overly vague and lacked constructive criticism, occasionally even being unnecessarily harsh. In some instances, no feedback was given at all. Submitting work was frequently an arduous task, as specific file formats were required that were incompatible with the content, such as demanding PDFs for documents that couldn't be formatted accordingly and were subsequently rejected. Furthermore, the lessons themselves were lacking in quality. Some lecturers would digress into unrelated topics, consuming valuable class time. The teaching approach was disappointingly minimal, with students being assigned tasks without any guidance or instructional techniques provided. If feedback was given, it was generally unhelpfully brief, merely stating that improvements were needed. The learning materials provided during the lessons were also subpar. Often, we were presented with pre-recorded 10-minute videos and expected to navigate our own way through the material. This lack of effort on the part of the lecturers was unfair and disheartening, making it challenging for students to invest their own efforts. The workload imposed on students was excessive and overwhelming, leading to the majority falling behind. Consequently, many students experienced a negative impact on their mental well-being, ultimately resulting in some dropping out. Additionally, the university failed to provide necessary information about the course, leaving students to rely on each other for essential details. Timetables and key information, including student cards, were significantly delayed without any valid explanation. Technological tools such as email, Blackboard, Teams, and attendance systems frequently malfunctioned, causing further frustration and hindrance to the learning experience. Tragically, instances of bullying were pervasive both within the classroom and online, including incidents targeting vulnerable individuals. Despite reporting these matters to the course leader, no action could be taken without the full names of the involved students, which was a requirement I couldn't fulfill. Regrettably, when I brought these concerns to the attention of the class representatives, they chose to ignore my pleas for assistance. Lastly, living in Leicester City proved to be unsafe, with prevalent cases of sexual harassment, homophobic and transphobic threats. Disturbingly, both the police and the university failed to take any meaningful action in response to these issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
