Budapest Business University - BBU vs University of Debrecen vs ESSCA School of Management vs IBS International Business School - IBS vs University of Pécs

Side-by-side comparison from 246 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Budapest Business University - BBU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Debrecen: wins 3/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
IBS International Business School - IBS: wins 2/7 categories
University of Pécs: wins 0/7 categories
University of Miskolc: wins 2/7 categories
University of Pécs Faculty of Business and Economics: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Tourism and Catering
Debrecen, Hungary
4.50
Read more reviews
87 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: International Management
Best programme: Psychology
Miskolc, Hungary
4.50
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Best programme: BSc Business Administration & Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.79
4.68
Win
3.73
4.26
4.18
4.18
4.20
Location
4.05
4.32
4.14
4.05
4.44
4.45
Win
4.43
Professors
3.89
4.45
3.90
4.58
Win
4.14
4.27
4.19
Internationality
3.95
4.80
Win
3.87
4.68
4.53
4.27
4.62
Student life
3.63
4.48
Win
4.07
4.37
4.44
4.27
3.81
Value
3.89
4.41
3.70
4.53
Win
4.26
4.09
4.33
Accommodation
3.37
4.25
3.37
4.05
4.19
4.36
Win
4.10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical knowledge and real-world application
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Strong student support and well-structured courses
  • +Engaging courses and intellectually stimulating curriculum
  • +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Beautiful campus and international student environment
  • +Strong marketing & business programs
  • +Excellent student support & community
  • +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
  • +Diverse international student body and cultural exchange
  • +Practical, real-world applicable knowledge and career opportunities
  • +Excellent teaching staff and flexible class schedules
  • +Practical and theoretical course balance
  • +Approachable, experienced faculty
  • +Supportive, multicultural community
  • +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
  • +Internationalization and cultural diversity
  • +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
  • +Diverse, international community and experiences
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world application
  • +High-quality, up-to-date curriculum with strong business focus
Cons
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
  • -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant student stress.
  • -Lack of support, career counseling, and assistance with internships/jobs is a major drawback.
  • -Quality of studies and academic support varies greatly by department, with some being subpar.
  • -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
  • -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
  • -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty for students.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support cause frustration.
  • -Unresponsive instructors and unclear academic expectations are problematic.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also received a very high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the area with the lowest score, though still above average. Other strong points include **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all of which are well-regarded. **Location** is also a positive, albeit slightly lower than the other commendable aspects.

This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.

This university garners impressive scores across multiple aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, followed closely by professors and value. On the other hand, location and accommodation received the lowest ratings, though still within a generally positive range. Overall, student life and facilities also scored well, contributing to a solid academic profile.

This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.

This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.

Regarding university ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in Internationality, receiving the highest score at 4.62. Location also scores highly at 4.43. Areas like Facilities (4.2), Accomodation (4.1), and Professors (4.19) are also well-regarded. Conversely, Student Life is the lowest-rated category at 3.81, indicating a potential area for improvement. Value received a solid rating of 4.33.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.

Approximately 77% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, helpful professors, and a good international community. A small percentage mention a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments.

With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

With a 4.53/5 average, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students praise practical knowledge, real-world problem-solving, excellent teaching staff, and a curriculum preparing them for today's world. The international environment, diverse student body, and opportunities to understand different cultures are also frequently highlighted.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.

The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.

95% of reviews are positive, highlighting enjoyable experiences, meeting diverse people, and practical learning. The remaining feedback mentions administrative processes being slow.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
38%
30%
63%
44%
55%
48%
4★
29%
48%
43%
26%
47%
36%
43%
3★
33%
21%
20%
11%
9%
9%
10%
2★
5%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
5%
3%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Dynamic environment and teachers

The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university

A well-rounded programme

The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

INTERNATIONAL ATMOSPHERE

- Great University. - Great support system from teachers. - You will meet different nationalities. - Recommendable to anyone. I am a Master student in International Management. This course will help you later for working in Multinationals company and also management level.

Practical Hours/ Language Barrier

My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.

Nothing to show

Modern, practical and worth It

My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close