Budapest Business University - BBU vs Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE vs University of Debrecen vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 204 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive and expert faculty and staff
- +International atmosphere and location
- +Engaging courses and intellectually stimulating curriculum
- +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Beautiful campus and international student environment
- +Strong academic programmes and learning support
- +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
- +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
- +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
- +Supportive and helpful professors
- +Friendly, diverse, and international student community
- +Numerous opportunities for personal and academic development
- +Engaging instructors and inspiring teaching
- +Relevant and practical curriculum
- +Excellent career support and opportunities
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently cited.
- -There is a general dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student stress.
- -Lack of support, career counseling, and assistance with internships/jobs is a major drawback.
- -Quality of studies and academic support varies greatly by department, with some being subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -There are frequent concerns about curriculum relevance and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Poor English proficiency of some professors hinders learning.
- -Lack of student support and care is a significant concern.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. While accommodations are generally positive, they represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with particularly notable strengths in its physical environment and student engagement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also received a very high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the area with the lowest score, though still above average. Other strong points include **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Value**, all of which are well-regarded. **Location** is also a positive, albeit slightly lower than the other commendable aspects.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.
Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.
The university receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Internationality** with a rating of 4.62. **Location** also stands out at 4.42, followed closely by **Value** at 4.27. The institution maintains strong performance in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both around 4.2. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.04. The area receiving the lowest rating is **Student Life**, scoring 3.88.
This institution excels in its accommodation facilities, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities, location, and value for money, all scoring a low 1. Professors, student life, and internationality received moderate ratings of 2, indicating these aspects are neither a strong suit nor a major weakness.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 18 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong Economics and Business programs, international atmosphere, and a strategic campus location. No negative reviews were recorded.
Approximately 77% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, helpful professors, and a good international community. A small percentage mention a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting supportive professors, a friendly atmosphere, and opportunities for networking and personal development. No negative feedback was reported.
This university has received one review, which is negative. The student rated it 1 out of 5 stars, citing unprofessionalism, poor program management, and English language difficulties among some professors.
The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university
Previously studying in the USA, moving to Budapest was a complete culture shock. However, this university offers a vigorous program with ample opportunities for students who want a career in diplomacy and foreign affairs. I feel constantly challenged and surrounded by bright-minded thinkers. Throwing myself into a new country, new culture, and new language has allowed me to truly be immersed in this field of study. While the program is in English, there are ample opportunities for additional foreign language classes. The fact that this university offers scholarships and the base price of tuition is already so low, is an added bonus.
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
My experience has been very positive. I particularly appreciate the supportive professors, diverse international student community, and the opportunities to develop both academically and personally. It offers a welcoming environment, and I would definitely recommend it to students looking for a quality and international study experience.
Nothing to show
