Yerevan State University - YSU vs American University of Armenia - AUA vs Armenian State University of Economics - ASUE vs National Polytechnic University of Armenia - NPUA vs International Scientific Educational Centre NAS RA - ISEC
Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and knowledgeable professors
- +Excellent opportunities and resources
- +Focus on personal development and positive experiences
- +Supportive learning environment with inspiring, diverse peers and helpful faculty.
- +High-quality, practical curriculum offering valuable real-world experience.
- +Positive campus atmosphere and central location in Yerevan.
- +Dedicated lecturers & practical, career-oriented courses
- +Strong academic foundation in economic/financial theory
- +Opportunities for research & university projects
- +Strong community and supportive professors
- +Practical skills and advanced labs
- +Positive city and career opportunities
- +Research opportunities and advanced degrees
- +Distance learning flexibility
- +Wide range of specializations
- +Diverse and proper educational programs across various fields
- +Essential artistic knowledge provision
- +Academic excellence and reputable institution
- +International presence and global outlook
- +Commitment to growth and development
- -Outdated teaching methods and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The examination system focuses on passing rather than actual learning.
- -The university offers little beyond what a basic course would provide.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and engagement.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive faculty are major drawbacks.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is frustrating.
This university garners excellent scores for its **Location** (5) and **Student Life** (4.5), alongside a strong showing for **Professors** (4.67) and **Value** (4.5). However, **Accomodation** (2.67) stands out as a considerably weaker area. **Facilities** (3.67) and **Internationality** (3.5) also received moderate ratings.
This university garners strong praise across multiple aspects, with its location particularly standing out at a 4.5 rating. Professors, student life, and value also received solid scores of 4.25. Facilities and accommodation were rated a respectable 4, while internationality also achieved a 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, with its prime location being its most significant asset.
A strong overall performance is evident, with the university excelling particularly in its **location (5)**. Ratings for facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all a solid 4, indicating a generally positive experience in these areas. However, **accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 1**. This suggests a considerable area for improvement.
This institution garners significant praise for its excellent **Facilities** and impressive **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.5. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded at 4. The university's **Location** and **Value** are rated a respectable 3.5, while **Accommodation** is its lowest-scoring area at 3.
An overwhelmingly positive evaluation is presented, with the institution achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Location. Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality are also strong, each receiving a commendable rating of 4. Value for money is similarly rated as excellent. The institution's primary strengths lie in its exceptional facilities, faculty, and prime location, while areas like student engagement and housing are rated very well, indicating a consistently high standard across most aspects.
The university demonstrates a notably strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are areas that could be improved, scoring a moderate 3. Other aspects, including **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, fall within a solid, positive range.
This institution garners perfect scores across every evaluated aspect. With a remarkable 5 out of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in all surveyed categories, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students.
Most reviews are positive (~79%), highlighting good education and professors. Some suggestions include more practical internships and international exchange programs. A small portion (~14%) found teaching outdated or lacking.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, knowledgeable professors, and international atmosphere. Little negative feedback was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a positive student experience, with ~67% of feedback being positive. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.33/5 average rating from 3 reviews, students are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include a supportive community, impactful future creation, and good networking opportunities.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university has overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students appreciate opportunities for research involvement and the flexibility of distance learning.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for its wide range of study programs and thorough artistic education. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university garners universally positive feedback. No negative comments were received, indicating ~100% satisfaction.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Armenian State University of Economics has many departments like Management, Finance, Accounting and Audit, International Economic Relations, Marketing, Computer Science. I got my bachelor degree in Management in this university. By the time I studied there (2010-2014), the classes had mainly theoretical part, almost no practical, most of the professors had lack of abroad training and up-to-date knowledge. Besides, some of the courses were not relevant to the specialization at all and you had no right to refuse taking those courses. This was actually very disappointing, as I expected the classes to be more up-to-date, more career-oriented. But still, here you can get sound knowledge for all the best managerial theories and practices if you're eager to learn. In order to get your bachelor degree in this university, you need to study for 4 years, and 2 for masters. Mainly local people study here, there's almost no nationality diversity. The university has several buildings separated for different faculties. The library is not very diverse. The university has its own cafeteria and sport ground. For me, this is a medium-level university, which can give you some basic knowledge to start your evolution from :)
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show