Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP vs INSA Rennes vs Studio Mercier vs Holland College - HC vs Karakalpak State University

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP (4.20)
Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP: wins 3/6 categories
INSA Rennes: wins 0/6 categories
Studio Mercier: wins 3/6 categories
Holland College - HC: wins 0/6 categories
Karakalpak State University: wins 0/6 categories
JPTS Institute Of Science, Management And Technology: wins 0/6 categories
ITS-ICT Piemonte: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Dentistry
Rennes, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Paris, France
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Film and Digital Art
Charlottetown, Canada
3.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.48
Win
Not rated
2.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Location
4.15
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Internationality
2.95
Not rated
3.00
2.67
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Student life
4.68
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.18
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.48
Win
Not rated
2.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities, including labs
  • +Strong connection between academics and practical/work fields

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-connected faculty and practical experience
  • +Access to professional studio facilities
  • +Renowned industry clientele and award-winning work
  • +Welcoming campus & helpful instructors
  • +Good starting point for further education
  • +Local accessibility

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging opportunities and open opinion sharing
  • +Strong career prospects and support

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and irrelevant by many.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of clear communication and feedback is a significant concern.
  • -Excessive and poorly communicated administrative issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of accessible and helpful administrative support.
  • -Inadequate or outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from the institution.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining university ratings reveals a highly regarded institution. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors (4.75) and Student Life (4.675), indicating excellent academic instruction and vibrant campus activities. Facilities and Location also score well. However, Accomodation (3.475) and particularly Internationality (2.95) present areas for improvement. The overall Value (4.175) suggests a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, and overall value. Student life also garners positive recognition. Conversely, the university's facilities and accommodation received the lowest ratings, suggesting areas for potential improvement. Internationality is rated moderately.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **internationality** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Ratings for facilities, student life, and accommodation are moderate, while value for money is well-regarded.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves strong ratings in several key areas, notably Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a solid 4. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation received zero ratings, indicating significant areas for improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Recurring themes highlight excellent teachers, a complete curriculum, and good facilities. Some suggest incorporating more practical, work-field-linked programs and improved computer lab installations.

Nothing to show

The university is praised for its practical approach, functioning as a production studio with expert staff. This hands-on experience leads to excellent outcomes, as evidenced by high-profile clientele and awards.

With a 3.33 average rating from 3 reviews, ~33% of feedback is positive. Students appreciate the welcoming campus and helpful instructors, viewing it as a good starting point. Some inconsistency in coursework difficulty was noted.

Nothing to show

This single review offers a positive outlook, highlighting the university's great ideas, opportunities, convenience, and excellent career prospects. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
80%
0%
100%
33%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close