Paris Graduate School of Digital Innovation - EPITECH vs ESSCA School of Management vs INSEEC Business School vs ESG Ecoles de Commerce vs IDRAC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Innovative, hands-on learning approach
- +Strong emphasis on independence and self-sufficiency
- +Challenging but rewarding educational experience
- +Strong international focus and diverse programs
- +Excellent networking opportunities and alumni network
- +Engaging learning environment and helpful professors
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Modern campus with diverse programs and extracurricular activities
- +Attentive and available staff
- +Practical training and professional opportunities
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- +Practical, industry-connected learning and professional professors
- +Valuable real-world experience through internships and study abroad
- +Comprehensive hospitality curriculum and career preparation
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of student well-being focus and a profit-driven approach that compromises educational quality.
- -Insufficient focus on soft skills development alongside technical education.
- -High cost relative to the perceived value or quality of education.
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors are a common complaint.
- -The high cost of tuition for subpar offerings is a significant detractor.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
- -A lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside strong internationality. Location also scores well, contributing to a positive overall impression. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a moderate rating. The value proposition is considered good, reflecting a generally positive assessment with room for improvement in housing.
This university's strengths lie significantly in its **Internationality**, rated at 4.29, and **Student Life** and **Professors**, both scoring a high 4.14. However, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating of 2.86. Other aspects like Facilities (3.57), Location (3.71), and Value (4) fall within a moderate to good range.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both earning perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. The university performs well in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, each receiving a solid 4. While **Value** is also strong at 4.5, these three areas represent the relative lowest scores in its otherwise impressive profile.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Professors**, achieving a high score. **Location** and **Internationality** also stand out with favorable evaluations. Conversely, **Facilities** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated similarly, indicating a moderate performance in these aspects. The **Value** proposition is also positively assessed.
Nothing to show
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with approximately 25% positive and 50% negative feedback. Recurring themes include a strong technical environment versus a lack of soft skills training, and concerns about the school's focus on profit over student well-being.
~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting international exposure, networking, and good professors. Some negative feedback (~14%) mentioned irrelevant courses and teachers.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting a modern campus with numerous activities and an attentive staff. Students also appreciate the diversified, practice-oriented programs with multiple sector choices.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and valuable study abroad programs. These experiences foster confidence, skills, and readiness for hospitality careers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
Nothing to show
