Warsaw University of Technology vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University

Side-by-side comparison from 193 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Lazarski University (4.50)
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 1/7 categories
SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH: wins 0/7 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 2/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 4/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Bachelor in International Logistics Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.27
4.07
4.25
4.00
4.61
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.74
Win
4.67
3.67
4.55
4.56
Not rated
4.30
Professors
4.35
4.23
4.50
4.18
4.57
Win
Not rated
4.10
Internationality
3.74
4.07
4.25
4.27
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.10
Student life
4.22
4.13
4.50
Win
3.70
4.46
Not rated
3.80
Value
4.35
4.17
4.25
4.09
4.62
Win
Not rated
4.30
Accommodation
3.78
3.64
4.00
Win
3.64
3.90
Not rated
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
  • +Interesting and practical programs with industry relevance
  • +Engaging learning environment and student experience
  • +Strong reputation and career opportunities
  • +Inspiring community and passionate lecturers
  • +Solid foundation in economics and useful resources
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes with real-world skills
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers and staff
  • +Flexible learning formats and opportunities for personal development
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community

Nothing to show

  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Bureaucracy and administrative issues cause significant difficulties.
  • -Online administrative services are problematic and unhelpful.
  • -Excessive control over student organizations is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, followed closely by **Professors** and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also rate well. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as the comparatively weaker aspects, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.

This university garners positive feedback across most areas, with **Location** being the standout strength at 4.67. **Professors** (4.23) and **Value** (4.17) also received high marks. The **Accomodation** rating, however, stands out as the weakest point at 3.64, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are generally well-regarded.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

This university scores highly in several key areas, with location and internationality being particularly strong points. Student life and accommodation received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Facilities and value for money are also well-regarded, while professors are rated favorably as well.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.21/5 from 24 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise excellent faculty, engaging teaching, and positive learning environments. No negative reviews were reported.

~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching, a good reputation, and career opportunities. A small ~3% of feedback mentions bureaucracy and less useful online resources.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, student-friendly learning environments, approachable lecturers, and opportunities for personal development and internships. No negative feedback was reported.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
43%
33%
27%
64%
0%
40%
4★
54%
50%
50%
45%
27%
0%
40%
3★
13%
3%
17%
27%
8%
0%
10%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Quality Education and campus life

Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close