Warsaw University of Technology vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University vs Civitas University

Side-by-side comparison from 215 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 2/7 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 5/7 categories
Civitas University: wins 0/7 categories
VIZJA University: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor in International Logistics Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Law
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
43 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.00
4.61
5.00
Win
4.00
4.16
4.00
Location
4.73
4.55
4.56
5.00
Win
4.71
4.33
4.30
Professors
4.36
4.18
4.57
5.00
Win
4.21
4.19
4.10
Internationality
3.77
4.27
4.63
Win
4.50
4.36
4.23
4.10
Student life
4.18
3.70
4.46
4.50
Win
3.93
3.92
3.80
Value
4.36
4.09
4.62
Win
4.50
4.00
3.93
4.30
Accommodation
3.82
3.64
3.87
4.50
Win
3.36
3.60
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes with real-world skills
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers and staff
  • +Flexible learning formats and opportunities for personal development
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and accreditations
  • +Commitment to student development and success
  • +Practical learning through internships and workshops
  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
  • -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
  • -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

This university scores highly in several key areas, with location and internationality being particularly strong points. Student life and accommodation received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Facilities and value for money are also well-regarded, while professors are rated favorably as well.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

With an average rating of 4/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, student-friendly learning environments, approachable lecturers, and opportunities for personal development and internships. No negative feedback was reported.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
35%
27%
64%
100%
57%
42%
40%
4★
52%
45%
27%
0%
29%
44%
40%
3★
13%
27%
8%
0%
7%
9%
10%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
0%
7%
5%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Nothing to show

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close