Warsaw University of Technology vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs College of Europe - CoE vs Kozminski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University

Side-by-side comparison from 141 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 0/3 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 0/3 categories
College of Europe - CoE: wins 3/3 categories
Kozminski University: wins 0/3 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 0/3 categories
Collegium Civitas: wins 0/3 categories
VIZJA University: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Natural Sciences & Mathematics, Social Sciences
Best for: Business & Management
Best for: Arts & Humanities, Social Sciences, Business & Management
Best for: Social Sciences, Business & Management
Best for: Social Sciences, Business & Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Life Sciences & Medicine, Natural Sciences & Mathematics
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
40 reviews
×
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Life Sciences & Medicine, Natural Sciences & Mathematics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.25
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
4.13
Location
4.70
2.75
5.00
4.06
5.00
4.71
4.33
Professors
4.35
4.50
5.00
4.57
5.00
4.21
4.13
Internationality
3.75
4.25
5.00
Win
4.57
4.50
4.36
4.20
Student life
4.15
4.50
5.00
Win
4.47
4.50
3.93
3.86
Value
4.35
4.25
4.50
4.49
4.50
4.00
3.88
Accommodation
3.85
4.00
5.00
Win
4.14
4.50
3.36
3.51
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and engaging faculty
  • +Relevant and practical programs
  • +Positive learning environment
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Expert faculty and VIP guest speakers
  • +Diverse international student community and cultural exchange
  • +Engaging study programs with travel opportunities
  • +Expert professors with engaging teaching methods.
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a comfortable learning atmosphere.
  • +Strong real-world application of academics and vibrant student life.
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs with updated knowledge and practical skills.
  • +Experienced and dedicated faculty creating an engaging learning environment.
  • +Focus on career development and job market readiness.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible and irrelevant curriculum fails to engage students.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Lack of transparency in the rating system and student support.
  • -Program focus alienates certain student groups.
  • -Administrative issues and unengaged professors.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including registration errors and unexpected fees.
  • -Poor quality of teaching and lack of engaging course content.
  • -Insufficient student life facilities and inadequate communication.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its Location, receiving an excellent score of 4.7. Professors and Value also stand out with high ratings of 4.35. On the other hand, Accomodation and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, at 3.85 and 3.75 respectively, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

This institution garners consistently high marks, excelling particularly in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a perfect score. Its value proposition, while strong, is the sole area slightly below the peak, rated at 4.5. This suggests an overall excellent experience with a minor caveat regarding cost-effectiveness compared to other aspects.

With a strong showing in most areas, this university excels particularly in its **professors** and **internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.57. **Facilities** also received a high mark at 4.5. The **location**, however, represents the lowest-rated aspect at 4.06, while other categories like student life, accommodation, and value fall within a good to excellent range.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

Overall, the university receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.2. Professors and Facilities also perform well with identical scores of 4.125. The university's weakest point is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating. Student Life and Value are mid-range performers.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~86% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.19/5, students highlight enjoyable experiences, strong programs, and dedicated faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, nearly 80% of reviews highlight enriching academic and networking opportunities. Some feedback, representing about 20%, notes a lack of transparency in the rating system and administrative inflexibility.

Nearly all ~94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, modern facilities, and vibrant campus life. A very small percentage of feedback noted no significant issues.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs, engaging faculty, and career preparation. A small minority (~5%) mention administrative issues and a lack of student life facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
33%
80%
64%
100%
57%
40%
4★
52%
50%
0%
32%
0%
29%
45%
3★
14%
17%
0%
4%
0%
7%
10%
2★
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
5%
Most useful review
Featured
Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

It can be better !

No transparency in the rating system, almost a lottery No interest for students coming from the southern neighbourhood . Programme focused almost on eastern neignbours , Professors not always implicated with students (Master thesis supervision) A multicultural programme than can easly turn to a cultral chock An administration that doesn't interact with students, rigid and static with few exceptions However, the programme still really interesting, the campus is really nice and the residences are comfortable and well equiped, Professor & courses of high level

Nothing to show

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Nothing to show

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close