Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Lazarski University vs Kozminski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University
Side-by-side comparison from 237 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and engaging faculty
- +Relevant and practical programs
- +Positive learning environment
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Expert professors with engaging teaching methods.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a comfortable learning atmosphere.
- +Strong real-world application of academics and vibrant student life.
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
Nothing to show
- +International environment and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
- +Personal growth and networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and irrelevant curriculum fails to engage students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its Location, receiving an excellent score of 4.7. Professors and Value also stand out with high ratings of 4.35. On the other hand, Accomodation and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, at 3.85 and 3.75 respectively, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
With a strong showing in most areas, this university excels particularly in its **professors** and **internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.57. **Facilities** also received a high mark at 4.5. The **location**, however, represents the lowest-rated aspect at 4.06, while other categories like student life, accommodation, and value fall within a good to excellent range.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.
With ~86% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.19/5, students highlight enjoyable experiences, strong programs, and dedicated faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
Nearly all ~94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, modern facilities, and vibrant campus life. A very small percentage of feedback noted no significant issues.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.
