Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University vs Collegium Civitas
Side-by-side comparison from 236 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, passionate, and expert faculty
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Practical, hands-on education with industry relevance
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +Practical focus and internship opportunities
- +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
- +Welcoming environment and competent staff
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
- +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with updated knowledge and practical skills.
- +Experienced and dedicated faculty creating an engaging learning environment.
- +Focus on career development and job market readiness.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative support is frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient feedback are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
- -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including registration errors and unexpected fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lack of engaging course content.
- -Insufficient student life facilities and inadequate communication.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also scored very highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which registered lower scores compared to other aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within a solid mid-range, indicating generally positive experiences in these domains.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.2. Professors and Facilities also perform well with identical scores of 4.125. The university's weakest point is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating. Student Life and Value are mid-range performers.
With a 4.23/5 average rating from 22 reviews, students praise excellent faculty and engaging programs. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting recognized technology programs and a positive learning experience.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs, engaging faculty, and career preparation. A small minority (~5%) mention administrative issues and a lack of student life facilities.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
