Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Lazarski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University
Side-by-side comparison from 227 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
- +Interesting and practical programs with industry relevance
- +Engaging learning environment and student experience
- +Dedicated and inspiring professors
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Opportunities for growth and diverse experiences
- +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
- +Supportive professors and direct student contact
- +Accessible location near Warsaw
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and accreditations
- +Commitment to student development and success
- +Practical learning through internships and workshops
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues, including misleading information and poor course coordination.
- -Inconsistent and disorganized teaching, with repeated content and last-minute class cancellations.
- -Lack of proper avenues for feedback or complaint resolution.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
- -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, followed closely by **Professors** and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also rate well. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as the comparatively weaker aspects, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Professors and facilities are particularly well-regarded, alongside a strong showing for internationality. Student life and accommodation represent the lowest-rated aspects, although these still fall within a generally positive range. Location and value also receive solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
Nothing to show
An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.
With an average rating of 4.21/5 from 24 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise excellent faculty, engaging teaching, and positive learning environments. No negative reviews were reported.
Approximately 92.5% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers, inspiring programs, and good organization. A small percentage (~7.5%) of negative feedback highlights issues with program structure and administrative concerns.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
Nothing to show
With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.
Nothing to show
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
