Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Lazarski University vs Vistula University

Side-by-side comparison from 343 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 1/7 categories
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities: wins 0/7 categories
Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR: wins 0/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 6/7 categories
Vistula University: wins 0/7 categories
VIZJA University: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw School Of Computer Science - WSCS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.00
Read more reviews
125 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.25
Not rated
4.61
Win
3.87
4.17
Not rated
Location
4.73
Win
4.04
Not rated
4.56
4.33
4.37
Not rated
Professors
4.36
4.32
Not rated
4.57
Win
4.02
4.17
Not rated
Internationality
3.77
4.18
Not rated
4.63
Win
4.60
4.24
Not rated
Student life
4.18
3.59
Not rated
4.46
Win
3.89
3.92
Not rated
Value
4.36
4.04
Not rated
4.62
Win
3.86
3.93
Not rated
Accommodation
3.82
3.44
Not rated
3.87
Win
3.14
3.59
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Well-organized and relevant programs
  • +Positive learning environment and resources
  • +High-quality teaching and respected professors
  • +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
  • +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community
  • +Diverse and inclusive international environment
  • +Supportive and practical learning experience
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and good facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and accreditations
  • +Commitment to student development and success
  • +Practical learning through internships and workshops

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
  • -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
  • -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and excessive wait times for simple tasks.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear curriculum focus.
  • -Lack of student support and unwelcoming faculty interaction.
  • -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
  • -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.

Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

With outstanding marks for its internationality, this university also excels in location. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest score, and facilities, though still solid. Professors, student life, and value all garnered respectable ratings, indicating a generally positive student experience.

An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

With an average rating of 3.98/5, ~74% of 128 reviews are positive, praising diversity and international student support. A small percentage (~8.6%) of reviews mention administrative delays and some professor communication issues.

With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
35%
44%
50%
64%
34%
43%
0%
4★
52%
49%
50%
27%
45%
43%
0%
3★
13%
3%
0%
8%
15%
10%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
1★
0%
5%
0%
1%
3%
5%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Practical and modern

Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.

Very good

I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.

Nothing to show

Supportive Environment and Practical Learning

Vistula University offers a supportive academic environment with experienced faculty and diverse international students. I appreciated the practical approach to learning and access to industry-related projects. The administrative processes could be improved, but overall, I would definitely recommend it to students seeking a globally oriented education.

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close