University of Warsaw - UW vs Warsaw University of Technology vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University vs Vistula University

Side-by-side comparison from 454 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kozminski University (4.60)
University of Warsaw - UW: wins 1/6 categories
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/6 categories
Lazarski University: wins 3/6 categories
Vistula University: wins 0/6 categories
Kozminski University: wins 2/6 categories
Collegium Civitas: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration + Marketing
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.00
Read more reviews
125 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
54 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.35
4.00
4.61
Win
3.87
4.51
4.00
Location
4.37
4.71
4.56
4.56
4.33
4.08
4.71
Professors
4.46
4.38
4.11
4.57
4.02
4.57
Win
4.21
Internationality
4.39
3.76
4.44
4.63
Win
4.60
4.57
4.36
Student life
4.23
4.19
3.63
4.46
3.89
4.48
Win
3.93
Value
4.46
4.38
4.11
4.62
Win
3.86
4.50
4.00
Accommodation
4.23
Win
3.86
3.56
3.87
3.14
4.16
3.36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Rich academic programs and engaging, career-focused curriculum
  • +Vibrant student life and attractive, affordable city location
  • +Excellent, passionate, and expert faculty
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs
  • +Practical, hands-on education with industry relevance
  • +Practical focus and internship opportunities
  • +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
  • +Welcoming environment and competent staff
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community
  • +Diverse and inclusive international environment
  • +Supportive and practical learning experience
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and good facilities
  • +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
  • +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
Cons
  • -Underdeveloped curriculum with irrelevant and unhelpful courses.
  • -Limited course offerings and poor access to information.
  • -Lack of clear communication and administrative support is frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient feedback are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and excessive wait times for simple tasks.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear curriculum focus.
  • -Lack of student support and unwelcoming faculty interaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of practical application and career support
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student experience metrics reveal a strong overall performance for the institution. Professors and value stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both scoring 4.46. Location and internationality also received very favorable scores. Facilities represent the area with the lowest rating, though still positive at 4.19. Student life and accommodation are rated similarly and comfortably above average.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also scored very highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which registered lower scores compared to other aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within a solid mid-range, indicating generally positive experiences in these domains.

This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

With outstanding marks for its internationality, this university also excels in location. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest score, and facilities, though still solid. Professors, student life, and value all garnered respectable ratings, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Warsaw receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99.1%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise strong academics, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life. A single review mentioned an underdeveloped course with irrelevant material.

With a 4.23/5 average rating from 22 reviews, students praise excellent faculty and engaging programs. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting recognized technology programs and a positive learning experience.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

With an average rating of 3.98/5, ~74% of 128 reviews are positive, praising diversity and international student support. A small percentage (~8.6%) of reviews mention administrative delays and some professor communication issues.

Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
36%
22%
64%
34%
65%
57%
4★
44%
50%
56%
27%
45%
31%
29%
3★
10%
14%
22%
8%
15%
4%
7%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
1%
3%
0%
7%
Most useful review
Most liked
Wonderful curriculum

Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.

Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Supportive Environment and Practical Learning

Vistula University offers a supportive academic environment with experienced faculty and diverse international students. I appreciated the practical approach to learning and access to industry-related projects. The administrative processes could be improved, but overall, I would definitely recommend it to students seeking a globally oriented education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close