University of Warsaw - UW vs Warsaw University of Technology vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Lazarski University vs Kozminski University
Side-by-side comparison from 349 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Rich academic programs and engaging, career-focused curriculum
- +Vibrant student life and attractive, affordable city location
- +Excellent faculty and professors
- +Recognized and high-quality programs
- +Engaging and practical learning experience
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
- +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with updated knowledge and practical skills.
- +Experienced and dedicated faculty creating an engaging learning environment.
- +Focus on career development and job market readiness.
- -Underdeveloped curriculum with irrelevant and unhelpful courses.
- -Limited course offerings and poor access to information.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of practical application and career support
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including registration errors and unexpected fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lack of engaging course content.
- -Insufficient student life facilities and inadequate communication.
Academic and student experience metrics reveal a strong overall performance for the institution. Professors and value stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both scoring 4.46. Location and internationality also received very favorable scores. Facilities represent the area with the lowest rating, though still positive at 4.19. Student life and accommodation are rated similarly and comfortably above average.
With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.2. Professors and Facilities also perform well with identical scores of 4.125. The university's weakest point is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating. Student Life and Value are mid-range performers.
University of Warsaw receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99.1%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise strong academics, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life. A single review mentioned an underdeveloped course with irrelevant material.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs, engaging faculty, and career preparation. A small minority (~5%) mention administrative issues and a lack of student life facilities.
Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
