University of Warsaw - UW vs Warsaw University of Technology vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University

Side-by-side comparison from 275 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Warsaw - UW: wins 1/7 categories
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 1/7 categories
Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR: wins 0/7 categories
WSB University - WSB: wins 0/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 5/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration + Marketing
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.33
Not rated
3.90
4.61
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.37
4.73
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.56
Not rated
4.30
Professors
4.46
4.36
Not rated
4.10
4.57
Win
Not rated
4.10
Internationality
4.39
3.77
Not rated
4.20
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.10
Student life
4.23
4.18
Not rated
3.56
4.46
Win
Not rated
3.80
Value
4.46
4.36
Not rated
4.00
4.62
Win
Not rated
4.30
Accommodation
4.23
Win
3.82
Not rated
3.50
3.87
Not rated
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Rich academic programs and engaging, career-focused curriculum
  • +Vibrant student life and attractive, affordable city location
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +High-quality teaching and respected professors
  • +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
  • +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
  • +Practical and flexible study formats
  • +Supportive and competent staff
  • +Emphasis on internships and career prospects
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community

Nothing to show

  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Underdeveloped curriculum with irrelevant and unhelpful courses.
  • -Limited course offerings and poor access to information.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
  • -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student experience metrics reveal a strong overall performance for the institution. Professors and value stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both scoring 4.46. Location and internationality also received very favorable scores. Facilities represent the area with the lowest rating, though still positive at 4.19. Student life and accommodation are rated similarly and comfortably above average.

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.

Considerably strong performance in several key areas, this university excels in its **Location** (4.5) and **Internationality** (4.2). **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.1. Areas requiring attention include **Student Life** (3.55) and **Accomodation** (3.5), which are the weakest aspects according to the provided ratings. **Facilities** and **Value** sit comfortably in the middle with scores of 3.9 and 4 respectively.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Warsaw receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99.1%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise strong academics, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life. A single review mentioned an underdeveloped course with irrelevant material.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.

With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.9/5, students praise practical learning, flexible schedules, and welcoming environments. Some note minor issues with certain lecturers' English and building locations.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
35%
50%
20%
64%
0%
40%
4★
44%
52%
50%
50%
27%
0%
40%
3★
10%
13%
0%
30%
8%
0%
10%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Wonderful curriculum

Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.

Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Very good

I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close