Vilnius University vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Kaunas University of Technology - KTU vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK vs Kauno University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 457 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Flexible study system and course choice
- +Supportive lecturers and international environment
- +Efficient problem-solving and administrative support
- +Practical learning and international opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and welcoming community
- +Development of academic and personal skills
- +Practical, real-world focused learning with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth through projects and events
- +Modern facilities and a strong sense of community and friendship
- +Engaging, practical learning with real-world application
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum and positive environment
- +Practical, career-focused education with real-life skills emphasis
- +Supportive and friendly learning environment with helpful teachers
- +Good facilities and structured, interesting courses
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is frequently cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Limited course offerings and a small campus environment are unappealing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum often lacks relevance and practical application.
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Internationality** (4.5) and **Professors** (4.4375), with high marks also for **Location** (4.4375) and **Value** (4.375). While **Facilities** (4.4348) and **Student Life** (4.3404) are also well-regarded, **Accomodation** (4.0417) emerges as the relatively weakest area in this assessment.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong performance in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience, though it still garners a respectable score. Other key areas like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a close, positive range, indicating a generally well-rounded university.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, most notably its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also scored very well. **Student Life** and **Value** received solid scores, while **Professors** were also rated favorably. The university's **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **student life**, both receiving very high marks. **Facilities** and **value** also score exceptionally well. Conversely, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are areas that received comparatively lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these specific aspects.
Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with particularly strong showings in **Professors** and **Accomodation**, both scoring an impressive 4.56. Students also appreciate the **Location** (4.25) and **Value** (4.22). Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality**, which received the lowest rating at 3.89. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated similarly well, hovering around 4.11.
Nothing to show
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With ~85% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.41/5, students highlight a flexible education system, international environment, and supportive lecturers. There is virtually no negative feedback.
With 193 positive reviews and 0 negative reviews, feedback overwhelmingly highlights quality education, supportive faculty, and international opportunities. Students appreciate practical learning and personal skill development, contributing to an average rating of 4.51/5.
Approximately 96.5% of reviews are positive, praising approachable lecturers, practical, real-world skills, and growth opportunities. One review expressed negative sentiment.
With a 4.8/5 average rating, reviews are ~100% positive. Students praise the mind-blowing environment, friendly professors, and practical curriculum. Some noted occasional teaching weaknesses in English for international students.
All 9 reviews are positive, averaging 4.78/5. Students highlight good quality education, practical and career-focused learning, helpful teachers, and a supportive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
This is one of the best universities in Lithuania right now. After taking admission here, I joined the classes and the learning system impressed me greatly. We have online learning moodle , where we can find everything that is taught in the class also we get all updates and study materials here. We can submit our lab works and assignments here that can helps us to track all the things. Apart from this, we have got humble teachers who are very cooperative and helpful to us. As a non EU student, I feel these things are adorable to me.
Nothing to show
Studying at Kaunas University of Technology has been a really good experience for me so far. I am studying Industrial Engineering Management, and I like how the program combines engineering knowledge with management and business skills. The subjects are practical and useful, especially for understanding how industries and companies work in real life. The teachers are friendly and supportive, and most of them are always ready to help students when needed. I also enjoy the international environment at KTU because I get to meet people from different countries and learn about different cultures. It makes university life more interesting and enjoyable. Another thing I appreciate is that the university focuses not only on theory but also on practical learning, teamwork, and projects. This helps students prepare for future jobs and gain confidence in their skills. Overall, I feel happy to study at Kaunas University of Technology. It is a good university for students who want quality education, personal growth, and better career opportunities in the future.
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
My experience at the university has been generally positive, especially because of its practical approach to learning. The classes are more focused on real-world application rather than only theory, which helps me understand how things work in actual job situations. Some professors are very supportive and explain topics clearly, always willing to help when students have questions. However, there are also a few classes where the teaching could be more engaging and better organized. What stood out to me the most is the multicultural environment and the opportunity to meet students from different countries. This really helped me grow personally and improve my communication skills. Campus life is decent, but I think more student activities and events could make it even better and more enjoyable. Overall, I would recommend this university to future students who prefer practical learning and an international environment, but I also believe there is still room for improvement in teaching consistency and student engagement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
