Vilnius University vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Kaunas University of Technology - KTU vs Aleksandras Stulginskis University - ASU vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK
Side-by-side comparison from 449 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Flexible study system and course choice
- +Supportive lecturers and international environment
- +Efficient problem-solving and administrative support
- +Practical, career-focused programs and supportive, knowledgeable professors.
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse community.
- +Modern facilities and flexible schedules for work-life balance.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Modern study environment and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical, real-world application
- +Engaging, practical learning with real-world application
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum and positive environment
- +Practical, career-focused education with real-life skills emphasis
- +Supportive and friendly learning environment with helpful teachers
- +Good facilities and structured, interesting courses
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is frequently cited.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a significant concern.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources are a significant drawback.
- -The university suffers from administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -A lack of course variety and limited English-taught programs are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum often lacks relevance and practical application.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Internationality** (4.5) and **Professors** (4.4375), with high marks also for **Location** (4.4375) and **Value** (4.375). While **Facilities** (4.4348) and **Student Life** (4.3404) are also well-regarded, **Accomodation** (4.0417) emerges as the relatively weakest area in this assessment.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the institution excels in its **Location**, achieving the highest score. It also demonstrates considerable strengths in **Facilities** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience. The remaining categories like Student Life, Internationality, and Value fall within a generally positive range.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with location and student life receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and internationality are also rated strongly. Areas for improvement are accommodation, which is the weakest aspect, and value, which is moderately rated. Professors and facilities also show solid scores, contributing to a generally favorable university experience.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **student life**, both receiving very high marks. **Facilities** and **value** also score exceptionally well. Conversely, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are areas that received comparatively lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these specific aspects.
Overall, this institution garners positive feedback, with particularly strong showings in **Professors** and **Accomodation**, both scoring an impressive 4.56. Students also appreciate the **Location** (4.25) and **Value** (4.22). Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality**, which received the lowest rating at 3.89. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated similarly well, hovering around 4.11.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With ~85% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.41/5, students highlight a flexible education system, international environment, and supportive lecturers. There is virtually no negative feedback.
With a 4.51/5 average, ~94% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, approachable professors, practical skills, and a friendly international environment. Zero negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, practical skills focus, and modern facilities. A single negative review (~3.7%) mentioned the institution being small.
With a 4.8/5 average rating, reviews are ~100% positive. Students praise the mind-blowing environment, friendly professors, and practical curriculum. Some noted occasional teaching weaknesses in English for international students.
All 9 reviews are positive, averaging 4.78/5. Students highlight good quality education, practical and career-focused learning, helpful teachers, and a supportive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
Nothing to show
Studying at Kaunas University of Technology has been a really good experience for me so far. I am studying Industrial Engineering Management, and I like how the program combines engineering knowledge with management and business skills. The subjects are practical and useful, especially for understanding how industries and companies work in real life. The teachers are friendly and supportive, and most of them are always ready to help students when needed. I also enjoy the international environment at KTU because I get to meet people from different countries and learn about different cultures. It makes university life more interesting and enjoyable. Another thing I appreciate is that the university focuses not only on theory but also on practical learning, teamwork, and projects. This helps students prepare for future jobs and gain confidence in their skills. Overall, I feel happy to study at Kaunas University of Technology. It is a good university for students who want quality education, personal growth, and better career opportunities in the future.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
My experience at the university has been generally positive, especially because of its practical approach to learning. The classes are more focused on real-world application rather than only theory, which helps me understand how things work in actual job situations. Some professors are very supportive and explain topics clearly, always willing to help when students have questions. However, there are also a few classes where the teaching could be more engaging and better organized. What stood out to me the most is the multicultural environment and the opportunity to meet students from different countries. This really helped me grow personally and improve my communication skills. Campus life is decent, but I think more student activities and events could make it even better and more enjoyable. Overall, I would recommend this university to future students who prefer practical learning and an international environment, but I also believe there is still room for improvement in teaching consistency and student engagement.
Nothing to show
