ESSEC Business School vs Pitzer College vs University of Illinois Springfield - UIS vs School of Innovation and Creation Technologies - ETIC vs The Catholic University of Eastern Africa
Side-by-side comparison from 85 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Experienced teachers & well-equipped facilities
- +Diverse, intensive courses simulating real-world experience
- +Practical work experience & networking opportunities
- +Supportive and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +Relevant and tailored course material
- +Quality education and diverse academic programs
- +Supportive professors and positive learning environment
- +Opportunities for personal growth and skill development
- +Strong business and management programs
- +Active student life and extracurricular activities
- +Qualified and dedicated teaching staff
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources frustrate students.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff create significant challenges.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for future careers.
- -Lack of communication and support from lecturers.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and lack of support.
- -Absent key leadership figures create a sense of neglect.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of academic support hinder progress.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in core areas, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation. Conversely, its performance in Internationality and Value is notably lower, receiving 3.5 stars in both. This suggests a highly regarded campus experience and academic environment, though there is clear room for improvement in its global reach and affordability.
This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its location receiving the highest marks at 4.72. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.14, alongside professors at 4.09 and student life at 4.05. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring 3.68, followed closely by facilities at 3.91.
This university receives its highest marks for **Location**, with a rating of 4.33. **Professors** are also well-regarded at 3.71. Areas with lower ratings include **Accomodation** (3.00), **Internationality** (3.14), and **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both at 3.29. The overall **Value** is rated at 3.29.
Assessments indicate a university with particular strengths in its academic offerings and surrounding environment. Professors and location both received high marks, suggesting excellent teaching quality and a desirable setting. Student life and accommodation are also well-regarded. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, which received the lowest score, and internationality, though still above average. The overall value proposition is rated positively.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Key themes highlight experienced teachers, well-equipped facilities, and valuable work experience opportunities. No negative reviews were recorded.
The university receives largely positive reviews (~77%), with students highlighting a supportive academic environment, knowledgeable faculty, and good facilities. A small fraction (~5%) of feedback points to issues with communication, infrastructure, and strict rules.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting enriching academics and faculty. Some students note administrative issues and a need for more practical resources.
With an average rating of 4/5, students praise the university's reputation, active student life, and qualified teaching staff. Some wish for more practical marketing courses and mention inconsistent administration.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As a first-year Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) student, I can confidently say this university is a complete disappointment. The lack of communication between lecturers and students is shocking—emails go unanswered, and there’s no support when issues arise. The infrastructure is falling apart—old, broken chairs that look like they belong in a primary school, dusty classrooms, and ancient computers that barely function (some seem to be from the early 2000s!). How are we supposed to learn modern computer science on relics? The online unit registration is a nightmare—it’s glitchy, unreliable, and has caused me to lose crucial units. Shockingly, even the fundamental computer science unit (the core of the degree!) was missing from allocations. The administration does nothing to fix these issues. Lecturers are unreliable—showing up late or not at all, with no makeup classes. The systems are always slow, and there are zero extracurricular activities, making campus life dull and isolating. Save your time and money—this place is a scam. If you actually care about your education, look elsewhere.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
