ESSEC Business School vs Mining University of Leoben - MU vs Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University - ATBU, Bauchi vs National School of Business and Management in Settat vs Jenderal Soedirman University - Unsoed
Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Dedicated staff and professors who actively support student learning.
- +Welcoming and helpful community among students and staff.
- +Impressive, modern university facilities and a professional working environment.
- +Friendly and supportive lecturers and positive student-lecturer relationships.
- +Conducive and serene learning environment with technology focus.
- +Affordable tuition fees and practical, relevant course delivery.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive lecturers and clear teaching
- +Abundant student organizations and practical experience opportunities
- +Good facilities and positive campus environment
- +Excellent facilities and technology
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong and practical engineering program
- +Affordable tuition and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Well-structured courses with practical application
- +Good educational foundation
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources create significant obstacles.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution is a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a constant problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and administration create frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date with industry demands.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum
- -Excessive workload and poor support
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources frustrate students.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is a recurring problem.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a consistent performance across all surveyed areas. The university received a rating of 0 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses, as all aspects are rated identically.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring an impressive 4.44. **Student Life** also receives high marks at 4.4. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.47. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a perfect score. **Location** is another highly rated aspect. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality**, all receiving moderate ratings. The university also performs well regarding its **Professors** and **Value**.
This institution shines brightly, boasting perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value. Its strengths lie in providing an excellent overall student experience and educational quality. The Location, however, stands out as a relative weakness, receiving a moderate rating. Internationality is also a strong point, though not reaching the top tier.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional performance, with perfect scores in every category. Its strengths lie equally in its modern facilities, the quality of its professors, its desirable location, vibrant student life, comfortable accommodations, and strong international presence. Furthermore, the perceived value aligns with these high standards, indicating a consistently excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes include dedicated staff and impressive facilities, with students highlighting helpful professors and a professional working environment.
With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 16 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students praise friendly lecturers, conducive learning environments, and relevant practical/theory teachings. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4 out of 5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight increasing learning potential and growing through study programs and student organizations. Facilities are also noted as adequate.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The lone review praises the massive campus, well-equipped labs, modern classrooms, and high-speed Wi-Fi. Professors were also noted as great, and the engineering program was highlighted as solid and intensive.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. It highlights a strong educational foundation, knowledgeable professors, and relevant course materials as key strengths. No negative feedback was provided.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
